Skip to content

Manual TestFlight Action#3077

Merged
buenaflor merged 6 commits intomainfrom
chore/manual-testflight
Jul 15, 2025
Merged

Manual TestFlight Action#3077
buenaflor merged 6 commits intomainfrom
chore/manual-testflight

Conversation

@denrase
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@denrase denrase commented Jul 15, 2025

#skip-changelog

📜 Description

💡 Motivation and Context

💚 How did you test it?

📝 Checklist

  • I reviewed submitted code
  • I added tests to verify changes
  • No new PII added or SDK only sends newly added PII if sendDefaultPii is enabled
  • I updated the docs if needed
  • All tests passing
  • No breaking changes

🔮 Next steps

@denrase denrase marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2025 11:49
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jul 15, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 88.89%. Comparing base (224aa18) to head (ec1603f).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3077      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.73%   88.89%   +1.16%     
==========================================
  Files         287       97     -190     
  Lines        9733     3522    -6211     
==========================================
- Hits         8539     3131    -5408     
+ Misses       1194      391     -803     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

cursor[bot]

This comment was marked as outdated.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Android Performance metrics 🚀

  Plain With Sentry Diff
Startup time 517.24 ms 573.10 ms 55.86 ms
Size 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB

Baseline results on branch: main

Startup times

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
575ebaa 478.00 ms 585.76 ms 107.76 ms
ec78888 457.94 ms 519.96 ms 62.02 ms
81f83eb 471.40 ms 522.14 ms 50.74 ms
0fb3800 465.64 ms 536.77 ms 71.13 ms
e2d675d 457.92 ms 529.17 ms 71.25 ms
9b99523 456.91 ms 490.55 ms 33.64 ms
c8596a6 474.00 ms 492.96 ms 18.96 ms
73dca78 476.53 ms 522.21 ms 45.68 ms
793f4dc 462.68 ms 544.21 ms 81.53 ms
93b7728 475.28 ms 489.13 ms 13.86 ms

App size

Revision Plain With Sentry Diff
575ebaa 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB
ec78888 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB
81f83eb 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB
0fb3800 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB
e2d675d 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB
9b99523 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB
c8596a6 6.54 MiB 7.53 MiB 1015.27 KiB
73dca78 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB
793f4dc 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB
93b7728 6.54 MiB 7.69 MiB 1.15 MiB

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@cursor cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Bug: Invalid Runner and Xcode Version Issues

The TestFlight upload workflow fails because it targets runs-on: macos-15, which is not a valid GitHub-hosted runner image, causing the workflow to be rejected or remain queued. Additionally, the workflow attempts to select Xcode 16.3, which is not pre-installed on GitHub macOS runners, leading to a failure even if the runner issue were resolved. Consequently, no TestFlight builds are produced.

.github/workflows/testflight.yml#L13-L19

upload_to_testflight:
name: Build and Upload to Testflight
runs-on: macos-15
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: subosito/flutter-action@fd55f4c5af5b953cc57a2be44cb082c8f6635e8e # pin@v2.21.0
- run: xcodes select 16.3

Fix in CursorFix in Web


Was this report helpful? Give feedback by reacting with 👍 or 👎

@buenaflor buenaflor merged commit e395fa8 into main Jul 15, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@buenaflor buenaflor deleted the chore/manual-testflight branch July 15, 2025 20:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants