Skip to content

ci: put osv-scalibr updates in their own group#2105

Merged
another-rex merged 2 commits intogoogle:mainfrom
ackama:G-Rath-patch-1
Jul 23, 2025
Merged

ci: put osv-scalibr updates in their own group#2105
another-rex merged 2 commits intogoogle:mainfrom
ackama:G-Rath-patch-1

Conversation

@G-Rath
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@G-Rath G-Rath commented Jul 23, 2025

I think this is needed because we are already grouping dependencies in the golang category into a group, so by having an explicit group name for this package rule it should cause them not to get merged

@G-Rath G-Rath requested a review from another-rex July 23, 2025 02:06
@codecov-commenter
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov-commenter commented Jul 23, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 67.60%. Comparing base (0592eca) to head (c027769).
⚠️ Report is 437 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2105   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   67.60%   67.60%           
=======================================
  Files         173      173           
  Lines       16319    16319           
=======================================
  Hits        11033    11033           
  Misses       4611     4611           
  Partials      675      675           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@another-rex another-rex merged commit 6345522 into google:main Jul 23, 2025
17 checks passed
@another-rex another-rex deleted the G-Rath-patch-1 branch July 23, 2025 03:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants