chore: Adding checkbox for changelog updates - #6012
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
|
No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉 ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe pull request template was updated to require changelog updates in the docs and add checkboxes confirming backward compatibility and that any lack of forward compatibility is gated behind a feature flag. Prompts for draft release notes and migration guides were removed. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Review rate limit: 3/5 reviews remaining, refill in 21 minutes and 16 seconds. Comment |
0642803 to
28defa8
Compare
28defa8 to
e4da82e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md (1)
19-20: ⚡ Quick winClarify forward-compatibility attestation in the PR checklist
Right now the template has an explicit “backwards compatible” checkbox, but forward compatibility is only handled as a conditional (“if this change is not forwards compatible…”). If the change is forwards compatible, there’s no positive attestation checkbox, which can lead to inconsistent review/compliance.
🛠️ Proposed change
- - [ ] This change is backwards compatible. - - [ ] If this change is not forwards compatible (e.g. a new feature), it is gated behind a feature flag. + - [ ] This change is backwards compatible. + - [ ] This change is forwards compatible. + - [ ] If this change is not forwards compatible, it is gated behind a feature flag.🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In @.github/pull_request_template.md around lines 19 - 20, Add an explicit positive forward-compatibility checkbox to the PR checklist: replace or augment the existing lines containing "- [ ] This change is backwards compatible." and "- [ ] If this change is not forwards compatible (e.g. a new feature), it is gated behind a feature flag." by adding a clear checkbox like " - [ ] This change is forwards compatible." (and keep the conditional gating checkbox for non-forward-compatible changes if desired) so reviewers can explicitly attest forward compatibility.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Nitpick comments:
In @.github/pull_request_template.md:
- Around line 19-20: Add an explicit positive forward-compatibility checkbox to
the PR checklist: replace or augment the existing lines containing "- [ ] This
change is backwards compatible." and "- [ ] If this change is not forwards
compatible (e.g. a new feature), it is gated behind a feature flag." by adding a
clear checkbox like " - [ ] This change is forwards compatible." (and keep the
conditional gating checkbox for non-forward-compatible changes if desired) so
reviewers can explicitly attest forward compatibility.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 42784482-2411-4dab-a876-d2de0cda993b
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/pull_request_template.md
Description
Updates the template that generates this pull request body placeholder.
We now track changes as formal documentation in the Terragrunt docs site, and we use GitHub draft/ready for review status to signal that work is in-progress.
Also updated the checkboxes to include a call out that all changes are supposed to be backwards compatible, and if they aren't forwards compatible, they should be gated behind a feature flag.
TODOs
Read the Gruntwork contribution guidelines.
Release Notes (draft)
Added / Removed / Updated [X].
Migration Guide
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
Chores