This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 30, 2025. It is now read-only.
feat: import group members that already exists - #473
Open
Filirom1 wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
|
This is really cool! As it appears that this provider is not being maintained, would you mind if I adopted this into my fork? Reference issue: #464 |
Author
|
@SamuZad yes sure |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi,
I’ve noticed that in the
group_memberresource, theDeviaVir/terraform-provider-gsuitepreviously managed the 409 "Member already exists" error as shown in the code from lines 96 to 124:https://github.com/DeviaVir/terraform-provider-gsuite/blob/master/gsuite/resource_group_member.go#L96-L124
Unfortunately, the successor
hashicorp/terraform-provider-googleworkspacehas not incorporated this error handling capability. To address this omission, I have submitted a Merge Request to include this feature in the new provider.Best regards,
Romain