chore: cull inactive permission holders solo-docs

[exploreriii]

Proposal to cull inactive permission holders (6+months) in solo:

  - name: solo-docs
    teams:
      github-maintainers: maintain
      hiero-automation: write
      security-maintainers: triage
      solo-docs-admins: admin
      solo-docs-committers: write
      solo-docs-maintainers: maintain
      tsc: maintain
    visibility: public

impacting:

  - name: solo-docs
    teams:
      solo-docs-admins: admin
      solo-docs-committers: write
      solo-docs-maintainers: maintain

[clowarden]

Validation succeeded

✅ The proposed configuration changes are valid!

Configuration changes

Directory

• leninmehedy is no longer a member of team solo-docs-admins
• olsentorfinn is no longer a maintainer of team solo-docs-maintainers
• olsentorfinn is no longer a maintainer of team solo-docs-committers

---

🔸 Please review the changes detected as they will be applied immediately once this PR is merged 🔸

[exploreriii]

/vote-soloDocsMaintainers

[git-vote]

Vote created

@exploreriii has called for a vote on chore: cull inactive permission holders solo-docs (#719).

The members of the following teams have binding votes:

Team
@hiero-ledger/solo-docs-maintainers

Non-binding votes are also appreciated as a sign of support!

How to vote

You can cast your vote by reacting to this comment. The following reactions are supported:

In favor	Against	Abstain
👍	👎	👀

Please note that voting for multiple options is not allowed and those votes won't be counted.

The vote will be open for 14days. It will pass if at least 66.66% of the users with binding votes vote In favor 👍. Once it's closed, results will be published here as a new comment.

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 11.11% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66.66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
1	0	0	8

Binding votes (1)

User	Vote	Timestamp
jeromy-cannon	In favor	2026-08-21 18:27:02.0 +00:00:00
@Ivo-Yankov	Pending
@nathanklick	Pending
@SimiHunjan	Pending
@Reccetech	Pending
@JeffreyDallas	Pending
@deshmukhpranali	Pending
@jan-milenkov	Pending
@olsentorfinn	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 11.11% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66.66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
1	0	0	8

Binding votes (1)

User	Vote	Timestamp
jeromy-cannon	In favor	2026-08-21 18:27:02.0 +00:00:00
@Ivo-Yankov	Pending
@nathanklick	Pending
@SimiHunjan	Pending
@Reccetech	Pending
@JeffreyDallas	Pending
@deshmukhpranali	Pending
@jan-milenkov	Pending
@olsentorfinn	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 11.11% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66.66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
1	0	0	8

Binding votes (1)

User	Vote	Timestamp
jeromy-cannon	In favor	2026-08-21 18:27:02.0 +00:00:00
@Ivo-Yankov	Pending
@nathanklick	Pending
@SimiHunjan	Pending
@Reccetech	Pending
@JeffreyDallas	Pending
@deshmukhpranali	Pending
@jan-milenkov	Pending
@olsentorfinn	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 11.11% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66.66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
1	0	0	8

Binding votes (1)

User	Vote	Timestamp
jeromy-cannon	In favor	2026-08-21 18:27:02.0 +00:00:00
@Ivo-Yankov	Pending
@nathanklick	Pending
@SimiHunjan	Pending
@Reccetech	Pending
@JeffreyDallas	Pending
@deshmukhpranali	Pending
@jan-milenkov	Pending
@olsentorfinn	Pending

[git-vote]

Vote status

So far 22.22% of the users with binding vote are in favor and 0.00% are against (passing threshold: 66.66%).

Summary

In favor	Against	Abstain	Not voted
2	0	0	7

Binding votes (2)

User	Vote	Timestamp
Ivo-Yankov	In favor	2026-08-31 13:25:35.0 +00:00:00
jeromy-cannon	In favor	2026-08-21 18:27:02.0 +00:00:00
@nathanklick	Pending
@SimiHunjan	Pending
@Reccetech	Pending
@JeffreyDallas	Pending
@deshmukhpranali	Pending
@jan-milenkov	Pending
@olsentorfinn	Pending