Skip to content

Circuit propagator#218

Open
ed-lam wants to merge 3 commits intohuub-solver:developfrom
ed-lam:circuit
Open

Circuit propagator#218
ed-lam wants to merge 3 commits intohuub-solver:developfrom
ed-lam:circuit

Conversation

@ed-lam
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@ed-lam ed-lam commented Sep 1, 2025

Add simple checking propagator for circuit constraint.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 90.47619% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
crates/huub/src/flatzinc.rs 7.14% 13 Missing ⚠️
crates/huub/src/constraints/circuit.rs 97.81% 0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
crates/huub/src/constraints.rs 56.92% <ø> (ø)
crates/huub/src/lib.rs 70.65% <100.00%> (+0.67%) ⬆️
crates/huub/src/reformulate.rs 84.33% <100.00%> (+3.73%) ⬆️
crates/huub/src/constraints/circuit.rs 97.81% <97.81%> (ø)
crates/huub/src/flatzinc.rs 52.65% <7.14%> (-0.50%) ⬇️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codspeed-hq bot commented Sep 2, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #218 will not alter performance

Comparing ed-lam:circuit (ee2e25c) with develop (5f97188)

Summary

✅ 21 untouched benchmarks

@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants