Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
WalkthroughUpdated Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
| "input-otp": "^1.4.2", | ||
| "lucide-react": "^0.486.0", | ||
| "next": "15.2.4", | ||
| "next": "^16.2.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🟡 Stale package-lock.json left behind after switching to pnpm
The PR updates package.json to next@16.2.0 and eslint-config-next@16.2.0, and adds a new pnpm-lock.yaml (indicating a switch to pnpm), but the pre-existing package-lock.json is left in place and still pins next@15.2.4 and eslint-config-next@15.2.4. Having two lock files from different package managers causes ambiguity: deployment platforms like Vercel auto-detect the package manager from lock files and may pick npm over pnpm, leading to installs based on the stale lock file. The package-lock.json should be removed now that pnpm is the intended package manager.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
| "input-otp": "^1.4.2", | ||
| "lucide-react": "^0.486.0", | ||
| "next": "15.2.4", | ||
| "next": "^16.2.0", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🚩 Major version bump (15→16) with no migration notes or verification
This PR performs a major version jump from Next.js 15 to Next.js 16. Major versions typically include breaking changes. While the current codebase is minimal (just the default template), the project has many dependencies (shadcn/ui components, AI SDK, etc.) that may have peer dependency expectations around Next.js 15. The pnpm-lock.yaml resolved successfully, suggesting no hard peer dependency conflicts, but runtime behavior changes in Next.js 16 (e.g., changes to the App Router, font handling via next/font/google at app/layout.tsx:2, or Image component at app/page.tsx:1) should be verified with a build and smoke test. No specific breaking issue was identified in the code, but this warrants a quick pnpm build verification.
Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.
46193fd to
eb6797c
Compare
eb6797c to
0c81a45
Compare
Update Next.js to latest (16.2.0). Run
pnpm installafter merge.Summary by CodeRabbit