Add Risky tier for bid-below-walk-away recover plays - #86
Merged
Conversation
Introduce a fifth option verdict between Costly and Disqualifying so familiar pursuit-pressure moves can be named without treating them as cleared gates. Retier the price-to-win vs walk-away reveal-tradeoff answer accordingly and align the shelf watch-for.
jsolly
marked this pull request as ready for review
July 20, 2026 11:47
jsolly
enabled auto-merge (squash)
July 20, 2026 11:52
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Adds a Risky option verdict so familiar pursuit-pressure plays can be named without calling them Disqualifying—or treating them as Defensible gate clears.
Changes
riskytier in the scoring ladder (best→defensible→costly→risky→disqualifying), scored at0.1bid-no-bid-price-to-win-walk-awayfrom Disqualifying → RiskyWhy not Defensible?
Making that answer Defensible would clear the question (
≥ 0.6) and contradict the shelf teaching that walk-away is the company’s floor. Risky keeps the real-world nuance without grading the habit as a sound gate.Test plan