improve: enhance tool descriptions for better LLM agent tool selection - #37
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the clarity and utility of MongoDB tool descriptions for LLM agents. By adopting a structured, action-verb-first format with detailed usage guidelines, the changes aim to minimize tool selection errors and improve the overall planning capabilities of AI systems interacting with MongoDB. Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request significantly improves the tool descriptions to aid LLM agent planning. The new detailed format is a great enhancement. My review focuses on ensuring the descriptions are complete and consistent. I've found that several tool descriptions are missing some of their available parameters, which could limit the LLM's ability to use them effectively. I've also suggested using template literals for multi-line strings to improve code readability and maintainability.
Rewrites all 8 tool descriptions in an action-verb-first format with 'Use when' / 'Do not use when' disambiguation, accepted parameters and error conditions, helping LLM agents select the right tool. Rebased onto main to preserve task execution metadata on tool definitions.
f435335 to
7b23c40
Compare
What
Rewrote all 8 MCP tool descriptions using an action-verb-first format designed for LLM agent planning.
Why
MCP tool descriptions serve as planning hints — LLMs use them to select which tool to call and in what order. The current single-sentence descriptions (e.g., "Update documents in a MongoDB collection") don't help LLMs distinguish between query vs. aggregate, or update vs. insert, leading to tool selection errors.
Format applied
Each description now includes:
Example: query (before → after)
Before:
After:
Scope
src/schemas/tools.ts)npm run build✓), lint verified (npm run lint✓)🤖 Descriptions improved with spidershield — open-source MCP security & quality scanner.