Skip to content

chore: add helm chart packaging & pushing to release process#130

Open
fmuyassarov wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
Nordix:chore/helm-chart-release
Open

chore: add helm chart packaging & pushing to release process#130
fmuyassarov wants to merge 1 commit intokubernetes-sigs:mainfrom
Nordix:chore/helm-chart-release

Conversation

@fmuyassarov
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature
/kind dependency

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add Helm chart publishing steps to the release pipeline so that dranet charts are automatically packaged and pushed to the OCI registry on every tagged release.

Which issue(s) this PR is related to:

Part of #128

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Apr 6, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@fmuyassarov: The label(s) kind/dependency cannot be applied, because the repository doesn't have them.

Details

In response to this:

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature
/kind dependency

What this PR does / why we need it:

Add Helm chart publishing steps to the release pipeline so that dranet charts are automatically packaged and pushed to the OCI registry on every tagged release.

Which issue(s) this PR is related to:

Part of #128

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fmuyassarov
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign gauravkghildiyal for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 6, 2026
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 6, 2026
Signed-off-by: Feruzjon Muyassarov <feruzjon.muyassarov@est.tech>
@fmuyassarov fmuyassarov force-pushed the chore/helm-chart-release branch from fba069b to 88a0a4f Compare April 6, 2026 21:16
@michaelasp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I know that @gauravkghildiyal has handled some of the releases previously. Bundling these two should be fine right?

Will let @gauravkghildiyal give the final approval.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 6, 2026
@michaelasp
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

/cc @gauravkghildiyal

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@gauravkghildiyal gauravkghildiyal left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @fmuyassarov.

- REGISTRY=gcr.io/k8s-staging-networking
- IMAGE_NAME=dranet
args: ['release']
- TAG=$TAG_NAME
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Non-blocking: I'm a bit uncertain if the TAG will work out correctly (and I also recognize that the current behaviour is also not correct where we don't correctly tag images). Something we'll need to verify separately from this issue whether TAG=$TAG_NAME was sufficient here to fix things.

- IMAGE_NAME=dranet
args: ['release']
- TAG=$TAG_NAME
args: ['ensure-helm', 'release']
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we have ensure-helm separately rather than making it as a dependency of one of the Make targets (similar to ensure-buildx)?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants