Skip to content

fix: memoize examples to prevent repeated re-renders when typing in … - #10554

Merged
keval718 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix-scrolling-after-search-doesnt-work-issue
Nov 11, 2025
Merged

fix: memoize examples to prevent repeated re-renders when typing in …#10554
keval718 merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
fix-scrolling-after-search-doesnt-work-issue

Conversation

@keval718

@keval718 keval718 commented Nov 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Problem
When the Template modal was opened, everything loaded correctly initially. However, typing in the search field caused continuous re-renders, leading to performance issues and unexpected repeated rendering of the template cards.

Root Cause
The examples array was being recreated on every render because it was defined using .filter() directly inside the component body.
As a result, the useMemo that initializes the Fuse instance (new Fuse(examples, ...)) was being re-triggered each time since examples received a new array reference.
This caused the useEffect that depends on fuse and examples to run repeatedly, updating state on each render and creating an infinite re-render cycle.

Fix Implemented

  • Wrapped the examples filtering logic inside a useMemo to ensure that the array reference remains stable between renders.
  • The memoized examples value now only changes when allExamples or currentTab are updated.
  • This prevents unnecessary recreation of the Fuse instance and stops the repeated state updates.

Result

  • Prevented unnecessary re-renders when typing in the search field.
  • Improved performance and responsiveness of the Template modal.
  • Search results now update smoothly and efficiently without triggering repeated renders.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Improved performance of template examples filtering to reduce unnecessary recomputations during component rendering.

@keval718 keval718 self-assigned this Nov 10, 2025
@keval718 keval718 added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 10, 2025
@keval718
keval718 requested a review from Wallgau November 10, 2025 21:24
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Important

Review skipped

Auto incremental reviews are disabled on this repository.

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Walkthrough

The change wraps the computation of filtered examples in useMemo with dependencies on allExamples and currentTab. The filtering logic remains unchanged; only the evaluation timing is optimized to defer computation until dependencies update.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Performance Optimization
src/frontend/src/modals/templatesModal/components/TemplateContentComponent/index.tsx
Wraps example filtering logic in useMemo with dependencies on allExamples and currentTab to prevent unnecessary recomputations on each render.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

  • Verify that allExamples and currentTab are the correct and complete set of dependencies for the memoized computation
  • Confirm the memoization doesn't introduce stale closure issues or unintended side effects with the filtering logic

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (3 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
Test Quality And Coverage ⚠️ Warning No tests were added or modified to validate the memoization fix for the performance optimization. Add unit tests covering the filtering behavior, memoization dependency tracking, and prevention of infinite re-render cycles caused by unstable array references.
Test File Naming And Structure ⚠️ Warning The PR modifies TemplateContentComponent to add useMemo but includes no test file following the *.test.tsx pattern required for component testing. Add index.test.tsx to verify memoization works correctly and prevents unnecessary re-renders when search input changes.
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main fix: memoizing examples to prevent re-renders during search/typing.
Excessive Mock Usage Warning ✅ Passed No test files exist in this PR that could contain mock usage patterns, as the changes are limited to a performance optimization in the component source code.

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@keval718
keval718 requested review from Adam-Aghili, Cristhianzl and deon-sanchez and removed request for Adam-Aghili November 10, 2025 21:24
@github-actions github-actions Bot removed the bug Something isn't working label Nov 10, 2025
@keval718
keval718 requested a review from lucaseduoli November 10, 2025 21:25
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot added bug Something isn't working and removed bug Something isn't working labels Nov 10, 2025
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Frontend Unit Test Coverage Report

Coverage Summary

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 15%
14.66% (3955/26977) 7.45% (1533/20560) 8.99% (532/5914)

Unit Test Results

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
1588 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 18.188s ⏱️

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Nov 10, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 6 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 31.40%. Comparing base (91d73e7) to head (4a651ec).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...odal/components/TemplateContentComponent/index.tsx 0.00% 6 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (0.00%) is below the target coverage (40.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.
❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (39.35%) is below the target coverage (60.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10554      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   31.47%   31.40%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files        1328     1327       -1     
  Lines       60091    60027      -64     
  Branches     8986     8986              
==========================================
- Hits        18912    18849      -63     
  Misses      40272    40272              
+ Partials      907      906       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
frontend 13.55% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...odal/components/TemplateContentComponent/index.tsx 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added bug Something isn't working and removed bug Something isn't working labels Nov 10, 2025
@github-actions github-actions Bot added bug Something isn't working and removed bug Something isn't working labels Nov 10, 2025

@Adam-Aghili Adam-Aghili left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! thank you @keval718

Screen.Recording.2025-11-10.at.4.55.34.PM.mov

@github-actions github-actions Bot added the lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer label Nov 10, 2025

@deon-sanchez deon-sanchez left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great Work @keval718

@keval718 keval718 removed the bug Something isn't working label Nov 11, 2025
@keval718
keval718 added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 11, 2025
@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Nov 11, 2025
@keval718
keval718 added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 11, 2025
@github-merge-queue
github-merge-queue Bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Nov 11, 2025
@keval718
keval718 added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 11, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit c5439dd Nov 11, 2025
67 of 69 checks passed
@keval718
keval718 deleted the fix-scrolling-after-search-doesnt-work-issue branch November 11, 2025 19:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

lgtm This PR has been approved by a maintainer

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants