Skip to content

Fix iceberg naming issues - #2935

Merged
joocer merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
#2934
Nov 18, 2025
Merged

Fix iceberg naming issues#2935
joocer merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
#2934

Conversation

@joocer

@joocer joocer commented Nov 18, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thank you for opening a Pull Request!

We appreciate your contribution to Opteryx. Your time and effort make a difference, and we鈥檙e excited to review your changes. To help ensure a smooth review process, please check the following:

Checklist for a Successful PR

  • Start the conversation: If you haven鈥檛 already, raise a bug/feature request or start a discussion. This ensures alignment on the change and approach.
  • Run the tests: Confirm that all tests pass without errors.
  • Maintain code coverage: If you鈥檝e added or modified source code ensure new tests are added to the test suite.
  • Update documentation and tests (if applicable): If your changes impact functionality, make sure the relevant docs and test cases are updated.

Fixes: #2934

Please replace <issue_number_goes_here> with the corresponding issue number.


Thank you for contributing to Opteryx! 馃帀

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

馃摝 Opteryx build version: 0.26.2-beta.1871

@joocer
joocer merged commit bf79afe into main Nov 18, 2025
16 of 18 checks passed
@joocer
joocer deleted the #2934 branch November 18, 2025 16:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

iceberg datasets assume catalog and namespaces are the same

1 participant