Skip to content

⚡ perf: preallocate slice capacity in anthropic messages loops#42

Merged
matdev83 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-9246238034975807275-24d1cd48
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

⚡ perf: preallocate slice capacity in anthropic messages loops#42
matdev83 merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
jules-9246238034975807275-24d1cd48

Conversation

@matdev83

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

💡 What: The optimization preallocates capacity for slice out variables in buildAnthropicMessages, assistantMessageParam, and userPartsToBlocks in internal/plugins/backends/protocols/anthropicmessages/invoke.go.
🎯 Why: To prevent multiple slice reallocations inside loops where the final length of the slice can be determined upfront via len(input_slice).
📊 Measured Improvement:
Before the change: userPartsToBlocks ran in ~31500 ns/op, producing 108 allocations, consuming ~55856 B/op memory on a 100-element input test slice.
After the change: userPartsToBlocks runs in ~18000 ns/op, producing 101 allocations, consuming ~29184 B/op memory on a 100-element input test slice.

This represents a ~42% reduction in operation time and a nearly ~48% reduction in memory allocation for that hot path snippet.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 9246238034975807275 started by @matdev83

Updated `buildAnthropicMessages`, `assistantMessageParam`, and
`userPartsToBlocks` in the anthropicmessages protocol backend
to preallocate slice capacity when lengths are known. This
prevents multiple reallocations during appending.

Co-authored-by: matdev83 <211248003+matdev83@users.noreply.github.com>
@google-labs-jules

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@matdev83, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 50 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 4aff9afd-74cc-4b63-8af9-134126d35db6

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02325fe and 054cb0e.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • internal/plugins/backends/protocols/anthropicmessages/invoke.go
  • internal/plugins/backends/protocols/anthropicmessages/invoke_bench_test.go

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

Format invoke_bench_test.go with gofumpt (grouped imports) and
replace the constant-bound for loop with range over int to satisfy
the modernize linter; prior CI failed Quality checks (gofmt) on
this file and would fail golangci-lint (modernize).

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@matdev83 matdev83 merged commit 3d3ba00 into main Jun 29, 2026
2 checks passed
@matdev83 matdev83 deleted the jules-9246238034975807275-24d1cd48 branch June 29, 2026 14:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant