Fix FAQ container expanding its width on content expand#266
Fix FAQ container expanding its width on content expand#266Sujanian1304 wants to merge 5 commits into
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Piyush kumar <piyush1304kumar@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @Sujanian1304, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request provides a targeted CSS fix to address a UI anomaly where an FAQ container's width would incorrectly expand upon content interaction. By explicitly setting the width to 100% for the affected element, the change ensures consistent layout behavior and prevents unintended visual distortions, thereby enhancing the user experience within the FAQ section.
Highlights
- CSS Styling: Introduced a
width:100%property to a global style definition, specifically targeting a modal or overlay element. - Bug Fix: This change aims to resolve an issue where an FAQ container was expanding its width unexpectedly when its content was expanded, as referenced by issue #265.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request addresses an issue where the FAQ container modal would expand in width as its content expanded. The fix involves adding width: 100% to the modal's styles, which effectively constrains its width relative to its parent container, preventing it from resizing with its content. The change is logical and should resolve the issue. I have one minor suggestion regarding code formatting to improve readability.
| margin-right: -50%; | ||
| transform: translate(-50%, -50%); | ||
| max-width: 85%; | ||
| width:100%; |
✅ Deploy Preview for meshery-play ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
|
@Sujanian1304 please add screen shot of your changes |
Rajesh-Nagarajan-11
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Please revert the changes in package-lock.json
Signed-off-by: piyush kumar <150425540+Sujanian1304@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@Rajesh-Nagarajan-11 ,i have reverted the changes in package-lock.json |
|
@Sujanian1304 you didn't revert package.lock.json you just deleted that please revert |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |


This PR fixes #265
Signed commits