Skip to content

chore(deps-dev): bump typescript-eslint from 8.57.2 to 8.58.1#844

Open
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/typescript-eslint-8.58.1
Open

chore(deps-dev): bump typescript-eslint from 8.57.2 to 8.58.1#844
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
dependabot/npm_and_yarn/typescript-eslint-8.58.1

Conversation

@dependabot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Apr 15, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Bumps typescript-eslint from 8.57.2 to 8.58.1.

Release notes

Sourced from typescript-eslint's releases.

v8.58.1

8.58.1 (2026-04-08)

🩹 Fixes

  • eslint-plugin: [no-unused-vars] fix false negative for type predicate parameter (#12004)

❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

v8.58.0

8.58.0 (2026-03-30)

🚀 Features

  • support TypeScript 6 (#12124)

🩹 Fixes

  • eslint-plugin: crash in no-unnecessary-type-arguments (#12163)
  • eslint-plugin: [no-extraneous-class] handle index signatures (#12142)
  • eslint-plugin: [prefer-regexp-exec] avoid fixing unknown RegExp flags (#12161)

❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

Changelog

Sourced from typescript-eslint's changelog.

8.58.1 (2026-04-08)

This was a version bump only for typescript-eslint to align it with other projects, there were no code changes.

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

8.58.0 (2026-03-30)

🚀 Features

  • support TypeScript 6 (#12124)

❤️ Thank You

See GitHub Releases for more information.

You can read about our versioning strategy and releases on our website.

Commits

@dependabot dependabot bot added dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update javascript code labels Apr 15, 2026
@dependabot dependabot bot requested a review from a team as a code owner April 15, 2026 11:10
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Title Lines Statements Branches Functions
contracts Coverage: 92%
 91.82% (472/514) 84.05% (195/232) 94.39% (101/107)
dapp-connector-proof-provider Coverage: 92%
 91.82% (472/514) 84.05% (195/232) 94.39% (101/107)
fetch-zk-config-provider Coverage: 100%
 100% (23/23) 84.61% (11/13) 100% (6/6)
http-client-proof-provider Coverage: 81%
 81.39% (35/43) 93.33% (14/15) 66.66% (6/9)
indexer-public-data-provider Coverage: 44%
 44.76% (107/239) 39.28% (44/112) 27.52% (30/109)
level-private-state-provider Coverage: 92%
 92.77% (642/692) 82.15% (267/325) 100% (89/89)
logger-provider Coverage: 100%
 100% (15/15) 100% (0/0) 100% (8/8)
midnight-js Coverage: 100%
 100% (0/0) 100% (0/0) 100% (0/0)
node-zk-config-provider Coverage: 100%
 100% (11/11) 100% (0/0) 100% (5/5)
utils Coverage: 89%
 86.79% (46/53) 80.48% (33/41) 63.63% (7/11)

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 15, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Unit Test Results - MidnightJS

   24 files  ±0     80 suites  ±0   4m 26s ⏱️ -6s
  551 tests ±0    549 ✅ ±0  2 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
1 116 runs  ±0  1 112 ✅ ±0  4 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit a6c40a7. ± Comparison against base commit 5ee9d70.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/typescript-eslint-8.58.1 branch 2 times, most recently from 86cbfa1 to a26667b Compare April 15, 2026 14:42
@dependabot
chore(deps-dev): bump typescript-eslint from 8.57.2 to 8.58.1
dd7b8e8 
Bumps [typescript-eslint](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/tree/HEAD/packages/typescript-eslint) from 8.57.2 to 8.58.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/blob/main/packages/typescript-eslint/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](https://github.com/typescript-eslint/typescript-eslint/commits/v8.58.1/packages/typescript-eslint)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: typescript-eslint
  dependency-version: 8.58.1
  dependency-type: direct:development
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@dependabot dependabot bot force-pushed the dependabot/npm_and_yarn/typescript-eslint-8.58.1 branch from a26667b to dd7b8e8 Compare April 16, 2026 08:03
@MidnightCI
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

MidnightCI commented Apr 16, 2026

E2E Tests Results

e2e_tests_reports: Run #3552

Tests 📝 Passed ✅ Failed ❌ Skipped ⏭️ Pending ⏳ Other ❓ Flaky 🍂 Duration ⏱️
123 119 0 4 0 0 0 26m 57s

🎉 All tests passed!

Suites

119 passed, 0 failed, and 4 other

Suite Passed Failed Other Duration
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/contracts.blocktime.it.test.ts
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should succeed when both device time and node time are less than future time
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should fail immediately on device when device time is already past the check time
        ⏭️ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should succeed on device but fail on node when submission is delayed
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should succeed when both device time and node time are greater than past time
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should fail immediately on device when device time is less than check time
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should succeed even with submission delay when checking past time
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should succeed when both device time and node time are greater than past time
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should fail when device time is not greater than check time
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should succeed when both device time and node time are less than or equal to future time
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should fail immediately on device when device time exceeds check time
        ⏭️ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should succeed on device but fail on node when submission delay causes time to exceed threshold
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should demonstrate different failure points for Lt check > Immediate past time - fails on device
        ⏭️ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should demonstrate different failure points for Lt check > Near future time with delay - succeeds on device, fails on node
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should demonstrate different failure points for Lt check > Far future time - succeeds on both device and node
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should handle maximum time values
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 1 > blockTimeLt tests > should handle zero time value
 ✅ 13 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 3 2m 47s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/contracts.blocktime2.it.test.ts
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 2 > blockTimeLt tests > should demonstrate different failure points for Lt check > Immediate past time - fails on device
        ⏭️ Block Time Contract Tests 2 > blockTimeLt tests > should demonstrate different failure points for Lt check > Near future time with delay - succeeds on device, fails on node
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 2 > blockTimeLt tests > should demonstrate different failure points for Lt check > Far future time - succeeds on both device and node
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 2 > blockTimeLt tests > should handle maximum time values
        ✅ Block Time Contract Tests 2 > blockTimeLt tests > should handle zero time value
 ✅ 4 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 1 1m 11s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/contracts.it.test.ts
        ✅ Contracts API > should create unproven call and deploy transactions for contract with private state
        ✅ Contracts API > should deploy contract on the chain [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API > should return deployed contract if it exists on specific address
        ✅ Contracts API > should return deployed contract if it exists on specific address without initialPrivateState
        ✅ Contracts API > should throw error if contract address has wrong format - length
        ✅ Contracts API > should return deployed contract if it exists on specific address with initialPrivateState and empty local private state store
        ✅ Contracts API > should return deployed contract if it exists on specific address with different initialPrivateState
        ✅ Contracts API > should wait indefinitely until contract exists on specific address [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API > should throw for incompatible contract types that differ by circuit ids
        ✅ Contracts API > should throw for incompatible contract types with same shape but different verifier keys
        ✅ Contracts API > should return contract interface and execute circuit operations [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API > should throw error on undefined public state at wrong address
        ✅ Contracts API > should submit a deploy transaction [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API > should submit transaction that calls circuit in contract [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API > should throw error if private state is undefined
        ✅ Contracts API > should throw error if public state is undefined
        ✅ Contracts API > should throw error if contract address has wrong format - not hex
        ✅ Contracts API > should return the latest observed state of a deployed contract and is independent of the chain state
        ✅ Contracts API > should wait indefinitely until state change, if stopped returns last contract state [@slow]
 ✅ 19 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 3m 23s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/contracts.scopedtx.it.test.ts
        ✅ Scoped Transaction Contract Tests > should submit scoped transaction that calls circuit in contract [@slow]
        ✅ Scoped Transaction Contract Tests > should submit scoped transaction that calls 2 different circuits in contract [@slow]
        ✅ Scoped Transaction Contract Tests > should submit scoped transaction that calls 2 circuits in contract and DOES NOT preserve execution order [@slow]
        ✅ Scoped Transaction Contract Tests > should not submit scoped transaction when one circuit call fails [@slow]
 ✅ 4 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 54.5s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/contracts.singlecontract.nostate.it.test.ts
        ✅ Contracts API > should deploy and find contracts with no private state [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API > should create unproven call and deploy transactions for contract with no private state
        ✅ Contracts API > should submit deploy and call transactions for contracts with no private state [@slow]
 ✅ 3 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 1m 28s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/contracts.snarkupgrade.it.test.ts
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [dedicated contract] [@slow] > should successfully remove verifier key using submitRemoveVerifierKeyTx
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [dedicated contract] [@slow] > should successfully remove verifier key using createContractMaintenanceTxInterface
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [dedicated contract] [@slow] > should successfully remove verifier key and disable circuit operation
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [dedicated contract] [@slow] > should succeed on verifier key insertion retry after removal
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [dedicated contract] [@slow] > should fail when inserting verifier key for wrong circuit after removal
 ✅ 5 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 3m 20s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/contracts.snarkupgrade.singlecontract.it.test.ts
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitReplaceAuthorityTx - successful replace authority with new key[@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitReplaceAuthorityTx - successful replace authority with same key [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitReplaceAuthorityTx - should fail on replace contract that is not deployed to contract address
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitReplaceAuthorityTx - should fail when signing key for contract address does not exist
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitInsertVerifierKeyTx - should fail on invalid verifier key
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitInsertVerifierKeyTx - successful insert on not present circuitId [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitInsertVerifierKeyTx - should fail on contract not present on contract address
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitInsertVerifierKeyTx - should fail on providers for different contract with different API
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitRemoveVerifierKeyTx - should fail on not present circuitId
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitRemoveVerifierKeyTx - should fail on contract not present on contract address
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > submitRemoveVerifierKeyTx - should fail on providers for different contract with different API
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > createContractMaintenanceTxInterface - replaceAuthority - successful replace authority with the new one [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > createContractMaintenanceTxInterface - replaceAuthority - successful replace authority with the same one [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > createContractMaintenanceTxInterface - replaceAuthority - should fail on contract not present on contract address
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > createContractMaintenanceTxInterface - insertVerifierKey - fail when key is still present
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > createContractMaintenanceTxInterface - insertVerifierKey - success when no key present [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > createCircuitMaintenanceTxInterfaces - insertVerifierKey - fail when key is already present
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > createCircuitMaintenanceTxInterfaces - insertVerifierKey - success when no key present [@slow]
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [single contract] > createCircuitMaintenanceTxInterfaces - removeVerifierKey - should fail on contract not present on contract address
 ✅ 19 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 3m 35s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/contracts.snarkupgrade.smoke.it.test.ts
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [@slow][@smoke] > should update verifier keys from one contract to another [@smoke]
        ✅ Contracts API Snark Upgrade [@slow][@smoke] > should fail on operate with previous authority after replacement
 ✅ 2 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 3m 37s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/indexer-public-data-provider.observable1.it.test.ts
        ✅ Indexer API > should return the history of states starting from defined blockHash (inclusive:true, expected:1,2) [@slow]
        ✅ Indexer API > should return the history of states starting from defined blockHash (inclusive:false, expected:2) [@slow]
        ✅ Indexer API > should return the history of states starting from defined txId (inclusive:true, expected states:1,2) [@slow]
        ✅ Indexer API > should return the history of states starting from defined txId (inclusive:false, expected states:2) [@slow]
 ✅ 4 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 3m 39s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/indexer-public-data-provider.observable2.it.test.ts
        ✅ Indexer API > should return the history of states starting from defined blockHeight (inclusive:true, expected states:1,2) [@slow]
        ✅ Indexer API > should return the history of states starting from defined blockHeight (inclusive:false, expected states:2) [@slow]
        ✅ Indexer API > should return the entire history of states of the contract with the given address (config:{ type: 'all' }, expected states:0,1,2) [@slow]
        ✅ Indexer API > should return the history of states of the contract with the given address, starting with the most recent state (config:{ type: 'latest' }, expected states:1,2) [@slow]
 ✅ 4 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 3m 36s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/indexer-public-data-provider.singlecontract.it.test.ts
        ✅ Indexer API > queryDeployContractState - should return a contract state equivalent to the initial contract state produced during deployment construction
        ✅ Indexer API > queryContractState - should return the current contract state of a deployed contract
        ✅ Indexer API > queryContractState - should return the current contract state of a deployed contract at defined block height
        ✅ Indexer API > queryContractState - should return the current contract state of a deployed contract at defined block hash
        ✅ Indexer API > queryContractState - should return null on no contract at contract address
        ✅ Indexer API > queryZSwapAndContractState - should return the current ZSwap chain state and contract state of a deployed contract
        ✅ Indexer API > queryZSwapAndContractState - should return null on no contract at contract address
        ✅ Indexer API > watchForDeployTxData - should return the data of the transaction containing the deployment of the contract with the given address
        ✅ Indexer API > watchForTxData - should return the data of the transaction containing the contract call with the given transaction id
        ✅ Indexer API > watchForContractState - should immediately return the current state of a deployed contract
 ✅ 10 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 94ms
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/level-private-state-provider.it.test.ts
        ✅ Level Private State Provider - Export/Import Integration > should preserve private state after database recreation [@slow]
 ✅ 1 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 55.1s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/nodejs.it.test.ts
        ✅ Ledger API - NodeJS Integration Tests > should run ESM module successfully
        ✅ Ledger API - NodeJS Integration Tests > should run CJS module with expected exit code
 ✅ 2 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 1m 39s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/proof-server.it.test.ts
        ✅ Proof server integration > should create proofs successfully for deploy and call transactions
        ✅ Proof server integration > should create proofs with transactions that has succesfull well-formedness
        ✅ Proof server integration > should execute 5 proveTx calls in parallel without errors
 ✅ 3 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 602ms
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/shielded.advanced.it.test.ts
        ✅ Shielded tokens - advanced operations > should mint and send immediate shielded tokens
        ✅ Shielded tokens - advanced operations > should mint and burn shielded tokens
 ✅ 2 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 1m 5s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/shielded.transfer.it.test.ts
        ✅ Shielded tokens > should mint tokens
        ✅ Shielded tokens > should deposit shielded coin via receiveShielded (issue #686)
 ✅ 2 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 1m 17s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/unshielded.balance.it.test.ts
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - 0 value
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - minted amount
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - greater than - false
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - greater than - true
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - less than - false
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - less than - true
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - greater than or equal - true (equal)
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - greater than or equal - false
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - less than or equal - true (equal)
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - balance > should get balance of tokens - less than or equal - false
 ✅ 10 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 3m
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/unshielded.cross-wallet-transfer.it.test.ts
        ✅ Unshielded cross-wallet transfer (issue #720) > should send night tokens to different wallet via right<>(disclose(addr))
        ✅ Unshielded cross-wallet transfer (issue #720) > should send night tokens to different wallet via disclose(recipient) (issue #720)
 ✅ 2 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 36.0s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/unshielded.mint-and-send.it.test.ts
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - mint and send variants > should mint tokens to contract address (self)
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - mint and send variants > should mint tokens to user address
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - mint and send variants > should send tokens to self
        ✅ Unshielded tokens - mint and send variants > should send tokens to contract address (self)
 ✅ 4 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 1m 53s
✅ testkit-js/testkit-js-e2e/test/unshielded.transfer.it.test.ts
        ✅ Unshielded tokens > Custom color > should mint different tokens
        ✅ Unshielded tokens > Custom color > should receive tokens - invalid
        ✅ Unshielded tokens > Custom color > should send tokens to wallet
        ✅ Unshielded tokens > Custom color > should receive tokens from wallet
        ✅ Unshielded tokens > Native color > should transfer night from wallet to contract - receiveNightTokens
        ✅ Unshielded tokens > Native color > should transfer night to wallet - sendNightTokensToUser
 ✅ 6 ❌ 0 ⏭️ 0 2m 6s

Github Test Reporter by CTRF 💚

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@sp-io sp-io sp-io approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file javascript Pull requests that update javascript code

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants

@MidnightCI @sp-io