Skip to content

TEMP: sync main into P-recursive table port - #1323

Merged
morluto merged 7 commits into
agent/port-p-recursive-table-residuals-v2from
main
Aug 13, 2026
Merged

TEMP: sync main into P-recursive table port#1323
morluto merged 7 commits into
agent/port-p-recursive-table-residuals-v2from
main

Conversation

@morluto

@morluto morluto commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Temporary branch synchronization for #1285. Merge current main into the feature branch only if conflict-free.

morluto and others added 7 commits August 13, 2026 03:01
* fix(lean): remove unchanged corrupt declaration caches

* test(lean): cover corrupt declaration-cache cleanup

* style(lean): format corrupt-cache regressions
Co-authored-by: morluto <76467478+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(probability): canonicalize Gaussian sparse inputs

* fix(probability): own Gaussian request canonicalization

* fix(probability): preserve canonical request round trips

* test(probability): replay canonical Gaussian requests

* docs(probability): distinguish raw and canonical bounds

---------

Co-authored-by: morluto <76467478+morluto@users.noreply.github.com>
* fix(topology): preserve non-maximal facet diagnostics

* test(external-sat): remove stale producer conclusions

* ci: shard ordinary Python checks by semantic lane
@morluto
morluto requested a review from N0zoM1z0 as a code owner August 13, 2026 07:58
@cursor

cursor Bot commented Aug 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Bugbot is not enabled for your account, so this pull request was not reviewed.

Enable Bugbot in the Cursor dashboard to get automatic reviews on future PRs.

@morluto
morluto merged commit 92d180b into agent/port-p-recursive-table-residuals-v2 Aug 13, 2026
26 of 30 checks passed

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 413e3846c2

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +21 to +25
return replace(
operation,
spec=replace(
operation.spec,
request_type=CanonicalGaussianPolynomialMomentRequest,

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Remove the duplicate Gaussian request-type override

FINITE_PROBABILITY_CAPABILITIES already declares this operation with CanonicalGaussianPolynomialMomentRequest in operations.py, so rebuilding its OperationSpec here creates a second owner for the same request contract and hides the concrete InstalledOperation type behind Any. Remove this patching helper and keep the request type solely in the operation declaration, as required for ordinary operations.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L108-L114

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Comment on lines +24 to 26
The claim is bound to canonical input and candidate digests, graph semantics,
checker identity, checker source digest, and provider runtime.
The verifier does not certify a directly supplied graph, an unbounded graph

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Remove the contradictory direct-input disclaimer

For callers of the diameter and radius verifiers, this paragraph now correctly says that verification binds submitted input and candidate digests, but the immediately following sentence still says the verifier does not certify a directly supplied graph. ExactComputedVerificationRequest and _validated_inline_payloads accept exactly that submitted {input, candidate} form, so the reference gives mutually exclusive descriptions of the supported route; revise the disclaimer to exclude only different inputs, unbounded families, and derived theorems.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L186-L189

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants