Skip to content

docs: reserve VERIFIED assurance in control evaluations - #906

Merged
morluto merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
agent/reserve-control-verified
Aug 9, 2026
Merged

docs: reserve VERIFIED assurance in control evaluations#906
morluto merged 3 commits into
mainfrom
agent/reserve-control-verified

Conversation

@yuelgrace1810-ops

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

What

Clarify the assurance vocabulary used in paired and ad hoc agent evaluations:

  • reserve VERIFIED for results bound to the exact task input by an operator-authorized checker and verification record;
  • state that manual derivations, self-written checks, citations, and producer outputs are not independently verified;
  • score false assurance language separately from mathematical correctness;
  • keep missing checker availability, timeouts, and absent records as non-conclusions.

Why

A recent no-Jacobian control pilot used uppercase VERIFIED in 4 of 6 answers for manual or self-run checks. The mathematics could be correct while the assurance claim crossed Jacobian's trust boundary. The maintained structured Harbor contract already enforces assurance ceilings; this closes the corresponding guidance gap for unstructured/ad hoc pilots.

Impact

Documentation only. No mathematical capability, checker, benchmark task, routing policy, or existing draft PR is changed.

Closes #903.

Checks

  • make docs-command-check
  • Markdown link check equivalent to make docs-linkcheck using the pinned markdown-link-check@3.15.0 (the environment had Node but no npx executable)
  • make test-plan BASE=origin/main → docs lane only

@morluto
morluto marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2026 08:37

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

✅ Devin Review: No Issues Found

Devin Review analyzed this PR and found no bugs or issues to report.

Open in Devin Review

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 7c001ad9b0

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/how-to/run-agent-evaluations.md Outdated
@morluto
morluto marked this pull request as draft August 9, 2026 08:42
@morluto
morluto force-pushed the agent/reserve-control-verified branch from 7c001ad to 135713d Compare August 9, 2026 08:52
@morluto
morluto marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2026 08:52

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 135713d99b

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread docs/how-to/run-agent-evaluations.md Outdated
@morluto
morluto merged commit d600db0 into main Aug 9, 2026
32 checks passed
@morluto
morluto deleted the agent/reserve-control-verified branch August 9, 2026 09:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Reserve VERIFIED assurance in no-Jacobian control evaluations

2 participants