Feedback Paper Submission

[ndaelman-hu]

This is just a tool for getting feedback. It does NOT get merged into main.

[QuantumChemist]

The author contributions are missing atm. It is one of the manuscript requriements.

[ndaelman-hu]

The author contributions are missing atm. It is one of the manuscript requriements.

They should be at the bottom of draft.text.

 \section*{Author Contributions}

\textbf{N.D.}: Conceptualization, Software, Original Code Draft, Visualization, Writing - Editing,
\textbf{C.E.}: Conceptualization, Software, Visualization, Video Editing, Writing - Original Manuscript Text Draft, Figure, Editing
\textbf{R.M.}: Implementation asynchronous servers, Extension Testing Infrastructure - Conceptualization Revision 
\textbf{S.K.}: Rollout Parser Support 

[QuantumChemist]

The author contributions are missing atm. It is one of the manuscript requriements.

They should be at the bottom of draft.text.

 \section*{Author Contributions}

\textbf{N.D.}: Conceptualization, Software, Original Code Draft, Visualization, Writing - Editing,
\textbf{C.E.}: Conceptualization, Software, Visualization, Video Editing, Writing - Original Manuscript Text Draft, Figure, Editing
\textbf{R.M.}: Implementation asynchronous servers, Extension Testing Infrastructure - Conceptualization Revision 
\textbf{S.K.}: Rollout Parser Support 

yeah, it was the overleaf version where it was missing. Just saw that 1 min ago. Sorry 🙈

[QuantumChemist]

I really like the new version of the manuscript. It has much more soul than the very technical version, that I had drafted 🤣

There are just two one issue left for now:
1. We should reference the figure somewhere (Edit, I found it 🙈 . Sorry, was overreading it)

1. I find the expression "Parse-Patrol combines the best of both worlds" a bit hyped (too bad that HypeLessLi doesn't work on overleaf). But I didn't change it for now because maybe you disagree?

[ndaelman-hu]

I really like the new version of the manuscript. It has much more soul than the very technical version, that I had drafted 🤣

There are just two one issue left for now: 1. We should reference the figure somewhere (Edit, I found it 🙈 . Sorry, was overreading it)

1. I find the expression "Parse-Patrol combines the best of both worlds" a bit hyped (too bad that [HypeLessLi](https://github.com/SimonNir/HypeLessLi) doesn't work on overleaf). But I didn't change it for now because maybe you disagree?

How about: "Parse-Patrol combines various community parsers into a single cohesive interface for AI and human developer alike."

[ndaelman-hu]

• Anyone willing to help with filling the citation markers?
• MCP should refer to the original paper, can we double-check that it is so?
• I have a citation in mind for the community. Leave that up to me.
• The registry and pypi could be urls.

[QuantumChemist]

I really like the new version of the manuscript. It has much more soul than the very technical version, that I had drafted 🤣
There are just two one issue left for now: 1. We should reference the figure somewhere (Edit, I found it 🙈 . Sorry, was overreading it)

1. I find the expression "Parse-Patrol combines the best of both worlds" a bit hyped (too bad that [HypeLessLi](https://github.com/SimonNir/HypeLessLi) doesn't work on overleaf). But I didn't change it for now because maybe you disagree?

How about: "Parse-Patrol combines various community parsers into a single cohesive interface for AI and human developer alike."

this sounds good to me!

[QuantumChemist]

My idea how to cite the MCP server "original work"

[QuantumChemist]

btw I would be in favour of merging this into main in the end to have our contribution to the manuscript as part of the repo 😄

[RubelMozumder]

It looks really great.

[ndaelman-hu]

Okay, the commit marked at this timestamp is the submitted version. Unless prompted by FAIRmat, this version does NOT get modified further.