feat(NgxControlValueAccessor): add possibility to transform model values#636
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @RobbyRabbitman, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces a significant enhancement to the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a transform function to NgxControlValueAccessor, allowing for the transformation of incoming model values. The implementation is clean, and the core logic is well-tested. My review includes suggestions to improve the example code in the test application and to correct some issues in the documentation, such as a typo and an example that would fail with strict template checking.
6b3aa04 to
2c2ba41
Compare
|
| Command | Status | Duration | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
nx affected --target=test --parallel=3 --exclud... |
❌ Failed | 16s | View ↗ |
nx affected --target=lint --parallel=3 |
✅ Succeeded | 36s | View ↗ |
nx-cloud record -- nx format:check |
✅ Succeeded | 2s | View ↗ |
☁️ Nx Cloud last updated this comment at 2025-12-15 02:32:25 UTC
|
@RobbyRabbitman looks like the CI doesn't pass. Can you look into it please? If we can make it pass we can merge I guess. |

#615