chore: Add .coderabbit.yaml

[ysknsid25]

I am creating .coderabbit.yaml in DRAFT, but I will leave it there until next Wednesday (5, Aug), so I would like everyone to write comments or suggestions on this PR with any review perspectives you think are necessary until then.

Currently, I am creating only the bare minimum base based on configurations set up in the CodeRabbit dashboard, the best practices of CLAUDE.md, Skills, and awesome-coderabbit.

.coderabbit.yaml is the configuration file for CodeRabbit.
By setting .coderabbit.yaml, you can provide context when reviewing CodeRabbit, which is expected to improve the accuracy of reviews.

Here are the items that can be set.
https://docs.coderabbit.ai/getting-started/yaml-configuration

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Added automated code review configuration with tailored review rules for source code, tests, and website content.
  • Enabled automatic reviews for non-draft changes.
  • Added repository coding standards and review guidance for improved consistency.
  • Configured review exclusions and project-specific checks for documentation, types, imports, and metadata.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Ignoring CodeRabbit configuration file changes. For security, only the configuration from the base branch is applied for open source repositories.

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 6a1f35fb-c63f-46bb-ad41-84dd251ecf99

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e789528 and dd0b670.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yaml

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• .coderabbit.yaml

---

Walkthrough

Adds .coderabbit.yaml with CodeRabbit review settings, excluded paths, and path-specific directives. Enables automatic reviews for non-draft changes. Configures repository guidelines, skills, learnings, issues, and pull-request context through the knowledge base. Disables selected review outputs, tool integrations, finishing-touch generators, and chat-generated art.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly and concisely describes the addition of the .coderabbit.yaml configuration file.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[pkg-pr-new]

Open in StackBlitz

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/valibot@1570

commit: dd0b670

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In @.coderabbit.yaml:
- Around line 41-46: Update the JSDoc requirements in the configuration text
around the exported function/interface rule to separate declarations by kind:
keep `@param`, `@returns`, overload-block, and factory-opening requirements for
exported functions and overloads; define interface-appropriate documentation
requirements separately; and add a method-specific opening form for method
creators. Ensure each rule applies only to its intended declaration type.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 378df657-a510-4960-86cc-3615061cdf91

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 62394c5 and 5cef9b1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .coderabbit.yaml

[Copilot]

🟡 Changes recommended

The knowledge_base.code_guidelines.filePatterns mappings currently use comma-separated strings where the schema expects lists, which can prevent guideline scoping from working as intended.

Once you've addressed the issues Copilot identified, you can request another Copilot review.

This review doesn't count toward merge requirements. Sign up for the private preview to control whether Copilot approvals count.

Pull request overview

Adds a new .coderabbit.yaml to configure CodeRabbit reviews for this repo, aiming to improve automated review quality by scoping guidance and loading the repository’s own standards into the review knowledge base.

Changes:

• Introduces baseline CodeRabbit review settings (profile, summary toggles, path filters, auto-review behavior).
• Adds path-specific review instructions for library, tests, and website docs.
• Configures knowledge_base.code_guidelines to ingest AGENTS/CONTRIBUTING and selected skill docs for scoped review context.

File summaries

File	Description
.coderabbit.yaml	Adds CodeRabbit configuration including review behavior, path-scoped instructions, and knowledge-base guideline ingestion.

Review details

Suppressed comments (1)

.coderabbit.yaml:112

• Same issue as above: files/applyTo are comma-separated strings, but should be YAML lists so each pattern is applied independently (and stays schema-compliant).

      - files: ".agents/skills/repo-website-api-create/SKILL.md,.agents/skills/repo-website-api-update/SKILL.md"
        applyTo: "website/src/routes/api/**"
      - files: ".agents/skills/repo-website-guide-create/SKILL.md"
        applyTo: "website/src/routes/guides/**"

• Files reviewed: 1/1 changed files
• Comments generated: 3
• Review effort level: Lite

We're testing this review assessment. Please use 👍 or 👎 to tell us if it's correct.

[cubic-dev-ai]

All reported issues were addressed across 1 file

<sub>Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.

Re-trigger cubic</sub>