Highlight the R and Python packages

[giswqs]

Summary

• add an R package badge to the README and Getting Started page
• mention both the Python and R packages in the README overview
• add direct Python and R package links to the primary usage list

Validation

• pre-commit run --files README.md docs/getting-started.md
• MkDocs site build
• git diff --check

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added an R package badge linking to the GeoLibre R package site.
  • Added README links for using GeoLibre’s Python and R packages.
  • Updated the getting-started page with the new R package badge.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 4a28a92b-47be-4971-ae61-d1294cef0bbf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7238e82 and dcd7f11.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• README.md
• docs/getting-started.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The documentation adds R package badges to the README and Getting Started page. The README also links to Python and R package usage across notebooks, RStudio, Quarto, R Markdown, and Shiny.

Changes

Documentation discoverability

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Package and platform links README.md, docs/getting-started.md	The documentation links to the R package, adds R package badges, and describes Python and R integrations.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• opengeos/GeoLibre#1771: Adds documentation that this PR links from the README and Getting Started guide.
• opengeos/GeoLibre#1636: Modifies the same documentation badge lists.
• opengeos/GeoLibre#1656: Adds related documentation badges and links.

Poem

I’m a rabbit with links in my den,
R badges now shine bright again.
Python and R paths clearly displayed,
Notebook and Shiny routes laid.
Hop through the docs with cheerful delight!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title clearly summarizes the changes that highlight the R and Python packages.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch docs/r-package-badges

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[github-actions]

This is consistent with the existing badge style (custom color + logo, matching Microsoft Store/Mac App Store/Google Play patterns). Everything checks out — this is a clean, low-risk docs change. No inline comments needed given the trivial and correct nature of the diff.

Code review

Bugs: None found. The diff is a straightforward two-line README/docs addition; both new links (https://r.geolibre.app/, https://geolibre.app/python/) resolve to nav entries that already exist in mkdocs.yml (r.md, python.md), and docs/r.md already exists in the repo, so the R badge isn't pointing at a nonexistent page. Confidence: high.

Security: None. Static markdown/badge links only, no scripts or executable content. Confidence: high.

Performance: N/A — docs-only change.

Quality:

• Minor: the PR description says it will "mention both the Python and R packages in the README overview," but the diff only adds them to the bullet list — the actual overview paragraph (README.md:20 / docs/getting-started.md:19) is unchanged and still only says "inside Jupyter notebooks" without naming Python or R explicitly. Not a defect in the shipped text, just a minor mismatch between the PR description and the actual diff. Confidence: medium.
• The new R badge (276DC3 color, logo=r) follows the same custom-badge convention used for Microsoft Store/Mac App Store/Google Play, so it's stylistically consistent with the rest of the badge row. Confidence: high (no issue).

CLAUDE.md: No violations — this change doesn't touch any of the guarded files/constants called out in CLAUDE.md (whitebox catalog, distance params, CSP allowlist, etc.), and docs-only changes have no build/test gate implications here.

No inline comments were posted; the change is trivial and correct as written.