docs: correct the Whitebox per-category tool counts

[giswqs]

Summary

• The README table of Whitebox tools per category listed 280 vector and 232 raster tools; the generated menu catalog has 313 and 256. The nine rows now sum to 1,066, matching the catalog.
• The matching approximate counts on the features page were updated the same way (vector ~315, raster ~255, remote sensing ~155).

Test plan

• Counts match the per-category totals in apps/geolibre-desktop/src/lib/whitebox-menu-catalog.ts (1,066 tools across 9 categories).
• README table and the features page render correctly.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated documented geoprocessing tool counts for vector and raster tools.
  • Revised Whitebox toolbox category counts, including vector, raster, and remote-sensing tools.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[coderabbitai]

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 28b4b594-1643-45f6-9882-59901860effe

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 220e8a4 and a7c57ce.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• README.md
• docs/features.md

---

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README and feature documentation now show updated vector, raster, and remote-sensing tool counts.

Changes

Geoprocessing tool count documentation

Layer / File(s)	Summary
Update documented tool counts README.md, docs/features.md	Updated the documented vector, raster, and remote-sensing tool counts.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• opengeos/GeoLibre#1648: Updates the same geoprocessing tool-count documentation.

Poem

A rabbit hops through counts so bright,
Vector and raster rise in sight.
Remote sensing joins the cheer,
Fresh numbers guide the reader clear.
“Nibble well!” says Bun, with delight.

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch fix/whitebox-tool-counts

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

I manually re-derived every category total from the checked-in apps/geolibre-desktop/src/lib/whitebox-menu-catalog.ts (counting { id: ... } tool entries per top-level category) and cross-checked against this PR's new numbers: Vector = 313 (exact match), Raster = 256 (exact match), Hydrology = 100 (unchanged row, exact match), Remote sensing = 154 (unchanged row, exact match), and the nine-category total = 1,066, matching the file's own header comment (/** 1066 tools across 9 categories. */). The docs/features.md approximations (~315, ~255, ~155) also follow the file's existing nearest-5 rounding convention. No factual, formatting, or style problems found.

No inline comments were posted — the diff is accurate.

Code review

No issues found. This is a docs-only correction (README.md and docs/features.md) updating stale Whitebox tool-count figures. I independently recounted every tool entry in the auto-generated whitebox-menu-catalog.ts for Vector, Raster, Hydrology, and Remote sensing categories, and all match the PR's new numbers exactly; the nine-category sum (1,066) also matches the catalog file's own header comment. The docs/features.md approximate figures follow the existing nearest-5 rounding convention used elsewhere in that line.

• Bugs: None found.
• Security: None found — no code paths touched, docs only.
• Performance: Not applicable.
• Quality: None found — wording and formatting consistent with surrounding table/list style.
• CLAUDE.md: No violations — this PR only corrects documentation numbers and does not touch whitebox-menu-catalog.ts itself, so the "regenerate with scripts/gen-whitebox-menu-catalog.mjs" rule doesn't apply here.