[Sync-En] pcre: expand the description of the ? meta-character - #1283
Open
lacatoire wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
[Sync-En] pcre: expand the description of the ? meta-character#1283lacatoire wants to merge 1 commit into
lacatoire wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Translation of php/doc-en#3057 (commit c414a81): the
?row of the meta-characters table now spells out the three roles of the character instead of the one-line summary. EN-Revision updated.Reading the whole file side by side turned up a handful of real defects, fixed in the same commit since the file cannot be split across PRs: Unicode scripts were called "guiones", which collides with the hyphen character discussed elsewhere on the page; "extended grapheme cluster" had become "grupo de glifos"; possessive quantifiers were "poseídos"; a link wrapped the verb instead of the word "cadenas"; and there were a duplicated "llaves (llaves)", a duplicated optimization clause, a misplaced closing parenthesis and a few agreement slips.
Fixes: #1274