Skip to content

SCRUM-264 Add CodeRabbit review configuration#34

Merged
gdaegeun539 merged 2 commits intoproject-lyrics:developfrom
gdaegeun539:feature/SCRUM-264-coderabbit-yml
Apr 14, 2026
Merged

SCRUM-264 Add CodeRabbit review configuration#34
gdaegeun539 merged 2 commits intoproject-lyrics:developfrom
gdaegeun539:feature/SCRUM-264-coderabbit-yml

Conversation

@gdaegeun539
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@gdaegeun539 gdaegeun539 commented Apr 14, 2026

Define the repository review profile, path filters, and Android- specific instructions so CodeRabbit focuses on meaningful issues without generating noise from build outputs and binary resources.

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • The commit message follows our guidelines
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features) : AI Code review guideline

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Select your one and delete others

  • Add AI Code review guideline
    • Associated with CI

What is the current behavior?

You can also link to an open issue here

code review with human-loop

What is the new behavior (if this is a feature change)?

CodeRabbit AI 리뷰의 설정을 추가해 human-loop의 병목을 다소 해소하기 위함.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change? (What changes might users need to make in their application due to this PR?)

CodeRabbit 리뷰의 가이드라인이 추가됩니다. 리뷰 톤이나 세부 요소들이 약간 달라질 수 있습니다.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Added code review configuration to establish consistent guidelines across file types and project components, including specialized rules for Kotlin files, Android manifests, Gradle files, and instrumentation tests.

Define the repository review profile, path filters, and Android-
specific instructions so CodeRabbit focuses on meaningful issues
without generating noise from build outputs and binary resources.
@gdaegeun539 gdaegeun539 self-assigned this Apr 14, 2026
@gdaegeun539 gdaegeun539 added the ci CI 관련 설정 수정 label Apr 14, 2026
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Apr 14, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new coderabbit.yaml configuration file is added to define automated code review settings, including a "chill" review profile, path filters for excluding build artifacts and resource files, path-specific review instructions for Kotlin, Gradle, and manifest files, and detekt tool configuration.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
CodeRabbit Configuration
coderabbit.yaml
Introduces automated review configuration with profile settings, path filters for generated/build files and Android resources, targeted review guidance for Kotlin/Gradle/manifest files, instrumentation test review scope, and detekt linter setup.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Poem

🐰 A config file hops into view,
With rules and filters, shiny and new!
Reviews shall be chill, detekt aligned,
Android resources carefully defined.
Automation blooms in YAML's delight! 🌱

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding a CodeRabbit review configuration file. It directly relates to the changeset content and is concise.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
coderabbit.yaml (1)

13-15: Consider extending binary/resource exclusions for Android image formats.

Line 13–15 excludes png/jpg/svg, but Android repos commonly include jpeg, webp, and sometimes avif; adding them can further reduce review noise.

Proposed diff
   path_filters:
     - "!**/.gradle/**"
     - "!**/build/**"
     - "!**/generated/**"
     - "!**/R.java"
     - "!**/R.kt"
     - "!**/*.png"
     - "!**/*.jpg"
+    - "!**/*.jpeg"
+    - "!**/*.webp"
+    - "!**/*.avif"
     - "!**/*.svg"
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@coderabbit.yaml` around lines 13 - 15, The exclusion list currently contains
the glob patterns "!**/*.png", "!**/*.jpg", and "!**/*.svg"; extend this list to
also exclude common Android image formats by adding patterns for "!**/*.jpeg",
"!**/*.webp", and "!**/*.avif" in the same section of coderabbit.yaml so those
binary/resource files are ignored as well.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Nitpick comments:
In `@coderabbit.yaml`:
- Around line 13-15: The exclusion list currently contains the glob patterns
"!**/*.png", "!**/*.jpg", and "!**/*.svg"; extend this list to also exclude
common Android image formats by adding patterns for "!**/*.jpeg", "!**/*.webp",
and "!**/*.avif" in the same section of coderabbit.yaml so those binary/resource
files are ignored as well.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 2f596916-fa47-4119-8d49-347563d4d919

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef72f7c and b6a039d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • coderabbit.yaml

@gdaegeun539
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@hyunjung-choi 사실 별로 확인할 거는 없어 보입니다. PR은 수동으로 제출했으니까요.

Reduce review noise from Android resource changes by excluding
additional image formats commonly used in repositories.
@gdaegeun539 gdaegeun539 merged commit 15e135c into project-lyrics:develop Apr 14, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ci CI 관련 설정 수정

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant