2027 cms iii - #2068
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2068 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 91.71% 91.59% -0.12%
==========================================
Files 159 159
Lines 7340 7378 +38
==========================================
+ Hits 6732 6758 +26
- Misses 608 620 +12 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Contributor
Author
|
Cat III IG |
Contributor
Author
elsaperelli
requested changes
Jul 28, 2026
| 'PCF APM Entity Identifier' => "//cda:participant/cda:associatedEntity/cda:id[@extension='#{entered_value}' and @root='2.16.840.1.113883.3.249.5.3']", | ||
| 'MVP Code' => "//cda:participant[@typeCode='TRC']/cda:associatedEntity[@classCode='PROG']/cda:id[@extension='#{entered_value}' and @root='2.16.840.1.113883.3.249.5.6']", | ||
| 'SSP PI Reporting' => "//cda:participant[@typeCode='IND']/cda:associatedEntity[@classCode='PROG']/cda:id[@extension='#{entered_value}' and @root='2.16.840.1.113883.3.249.5.7']", | ||
| 'ASM Cohort' => "//cda:participant[@typeCode='TRC']/cda:associatedEntity[@classCode='PROG']/cda:id[@extension='#{entered_value}' and @root='2.16.840.1.113883.3.249.5.7']", |
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Is the root and typeCode here correct?
Contributor
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Good catch. I based that off the example in the IG, not the shall statements. Looks like there is a disconnect. I think the shall statements should be what we use. I'll have to flag this for the QRDA team.
elsaperelli
requested changes
Jul 28, 2026
| description: | ||
| ep: 'Each ASM participant is assigned to a specific cohort.' | ||
| conf: | ||
| ep: '(CONF:CMS_160)' |
Contributor
Author
|
I picked 160 since it was the parent conformance statement. |
1 similar comment
Contributor
Author
|
I picked 160 since it was the parent conformance statement. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull requests into Cypress require the following. Submitter and reviewer should ✅ when done. For items that are not-applicable, note it's not-applicable ("N/A") and ✅.
Submitter:
Reviewer 1:
Name:
Reviewer 2:
Name: