Draft
Conversation
d0247a1 to
0eeee5c
Compare
30fe1a1 to
b04529c
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
It turns out some VPN infrastructure spoofs plain DNS responses, at least if trying to reach a non working DNS server address such as 1.2.3.4. I'm not sure if they spoof all DNS responses, but that sounds like a security/privacy issue to me. I think it would be wise to firewall lock output PLAIN dns traffic to:
One should also:
Issue
Found whilst fiddling with #3109 where I had to run
to block plain dns from escaping
Assertions