Skip to content

allow to manually select center of resonator freq and bias spectroscopy#1466

Draft
RoyStegeman wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
flexible_spec_range
Draft

allow to manually select center of resonator freq and bias spectroscopy#1466
RoyStegeman wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
flexible_spec_range

Conversation

@RoyStegeman

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

While for re-calibration it makes sense to take the default value from the calibration.json. It should also be possible to define the sweeping window without modifying the calibration.json.

I'm not sure if this is the way I want to solve it, so therefore this PR Is a draft.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Apr 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 94.70%. Comparing base (e9797a6) to head (e9e7d9d).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1466      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.73%   94.70%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         135      135              
  Lines       10789    10795       +6     
==========================================
+ Hits        10221    10223       +2     
- Misses        568      572       +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 94.70% <100.00%> (-0.04%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
...ocols/flux_dependence/resonator_flux_dependence.py 97.67% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@alecandido

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Would you consider starting implementing this, #1300, just for this protocol?

If you do not agree on the proposed interface, we can discuss about it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants