Skip to content

fix: correct Tree Ring skill guidance - #1253

Open
TerminallyLazy wants to merge 1 commit into
sickn33:mainfrom
TerminallyLazy:codex/tree-ring-skill-command-fixes
Open

fix: correct Tree Ring skill guidance#1253
TerminallyLazy wants to merge 1 commit into
sickn33:mainfrom
TerminallyLazy:codex/tree-ring-skill-command-fixes

Conversation

@TerminallyLazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Correct the existing Tree Ring Memory skill guidance after its earlier merge:

  • align the license and README credit with the upstream MIT license
  • replace unsupported recall and evidence flags with current CLI syntax
  • document project-local installation, initialization, and update flows
  • pin and verify the installer before execution, with explicit approval before download and again before running it

Type of change

  • Skill PR
  • Docs PR
  • Automated Skill Review (awaiting this PR workflow)

Contributor checklist

  • I read the contributor standards and maintenance documentation.
  • Skill metadata and trigger/limitation guidance are valid.
  • Risk remains declared safe.
  • Security documentation checks and manual review were completed.
  • This is a source-only change; generated catalog artifacts are not included.
  • README credit and license now match the upstream source.
  • Maintainers may edit this branch.

Validation

  • npm run chain
  • npm run check:warning-budget
  • npm run validate:references
  • npm run security:docs
  • npm run test (113 groups passed; network integrations skipped by repository default)
  • npm run check:readme-credits -- --base origin/main --head HEAD
  • npm run pr:evidence -- --base origin/main --head HEAD --output /tmp/tree-ring-pr-evidence.json --json (blocking: false)

Follow-up to the Tree Ring Memory entry merged in #791.

@TerminallyLazy
TerminallyLazy force-pushed the codex/tree-ring-skill-command-fixes branch from 9c6fbd6 to dcc5cc9 Compare August 25, 2026 22:32

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 9c6fbd65d9

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines +84 to +85
`tree-ring --root .tree-ring init`; for a project-local CLI, use
`.tree-ring/bin/tree-ring --root .tree-ring init`.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Use the project-local executable in subsequent commands

When the recommended --project installation is used on a machine without a global Tree Ring installation, the executable is available only as .tree-ring/bin/tree-ring, as this paragraph itself notes. However, the update command immediately below and every recall, remember, and evidence example still invoke bare tree-ring, so following the documented flow produces command not found. Define the executable once, add the local directory to PATH, or use the project-local path consistently throughout the remaining examples.

AGENTS.md reference: AGENTS.md:L52-L54

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@TerminallyLazy

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Maintainer-ready follow-up: current head dcc5cc9 is clean and every reported CI/security/source-validation check is green. The Tree Ring guidance now uses the verified bootstrap/update path and project-local tree-ring init flow. No further code review findings are outstanding; the remaining gate is the repository’s required human review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant