Skip to content

chore: update release candidate for 1.1304.0#6711

Open
PeterSchafer wants to merge 4 commits intorelease-candidatefrom
chore/update_rc_1.1304.0
Open

chore: update release candidate for 1.1304.0#6711
PeterSchafer wants to merge 4 commits intorelease-candidatefrom
chore/update_rc_1.1304.0

Conversation

@PeterSchafer
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pull Request Submission Checklist

  • Follows CONTRIBUTING guidelines
  • Commit messages
    are release-note ready, emphasizing
    what was changed, not how.
  • Includes detailed description of changes
  • Contains risk assessment (Low | Medium | High)
  • Highlights breaking API changes (if applicable)
  • Links to automated tests covering new functionality
  • Includes manual testing instructions (if necessary)
  • Updates relevant GitBook documentation (PR link: ___)
  • Includes product update to be announced in the next stable release notes

What does this PR do?

Where should the reviewer start?

How should this be manually tested?

What's the product update that needs to be communicated to CLI users?

@snyk-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown

snyk-io bot commented Apr 7, 2026

Snyk checks have passed. No issues have been found so far.

Status Scan Engine Critical High Medium Low Total (0)
Open Source Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Licenses 0 0 0 0 0 issues
Code Security 0 0 0 0 0 issues

💻 Catch issues earlier using the plugins for VS Code, JetBrains IDEs, Visual Studio, and Eclipse.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2026

Warnings
⚠️ There are multiple commits on your branch, please squash them locally before merging!

Generated by 🚫 dangerJS against dee50b9

@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer marked this pull request as ready for review April 7, 2026 16:59
@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer requested review from a team as code owners April 7, 2026 16:59
@PeterSchafer PeterSchafer enabled auto-merge April 7, 2026 17:00
@snyk-pr-review-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

🧪 No relevant tests
🔒 No security concerns identified
⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Brittle Cache Logic 🟡 [minor]

The logic for reading and parsing the local cached schema at lines 10-13 is implemented outside of the try...catch block. If a file exists in the sarif-schemas directory but is malformed or corrupted (e.g., contains invalid JSON), JSON.parse(content) will throw an unhandled exception. This causes the test suite to crash during the beforeAll setup in cli-sarif-output.spec.ts instead of falling back to fetching the schema from the network as intended by the logic at lines 16-25.

const content = fs.readFileSync(localPath, 'utf-8');
return JSON.parse(content);
Inconsistent Error Wrapping 🟡 [minor]

The new URL(uri) call is located outside the try...catch block. If an invalid or malformed URI is passed to getSarifSchema, the function will throw a raw URL constructor exception instead of the descriptive wrapped error provided in the catch block at the end of the function. Moving this check inside the try block would ensure consistent error reporting.

const url = new URL(uri);
📚 Repository Context Analyzed

This review considered 16 relevant code sections from 4 files (average relevance: 0.76)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants