Skip to content

Allow 3.78 build rpm and deb packages#47

Open
lunarfs wants to merge 2 commits intosonatype-nexus-community:mainfrom
lunarfs:exclude_arch_specific_java_from_noarch_packages
Open

Allow 3.78 build rpm and deb packages#47
lunarfs wants to merge 2 commits intosonatype-nexus-community:mainfrom
lunarfs:exclude_arch_specific_java_from_noarch_packages

Conversation

@lunarfs
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@lunarfs lunarfs commented Mar 28, 2025

Removing jdk from package as it is installed as a dependeny.
Complying with new naming scheme.
Remove EMBEDDED_JDK lookup as it creates noise ,and we know we removed the jdk.

…g with new naming scheme. remove EMBEDDED_JDK lookup as it creates noise ,and we know we removed the jdk.
@paul-botsco-2-0 paul-botsco-2-0 bot added the 🧐 cla not signed The CLA needs to be signed label Mar 28, 2025
@paul-botsco-2-0
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Thanks for the contribution. Before we can merge this, we need @lunarfs to sign the Contributor License Agreement

@lunarfs

This comment was marked as outdated.

@paul-botsco-2-0 paul-botsco-2-0 bot added 😍 cla signed The CLA is signed and removed 🧐 cla not signed The CLA needs to be signed labels Mar 28, 2025
@lunarfs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

lunarfs commented Mar 28, 2025

So i have a local docker container running with the debian package installed. i will start looking into testing this in a more production like env
Screenshot 2025-03-28 at 12 02 24

@lunarfs lunarfs marked this pull request as ready for review March 31, 2025 06:16
@lunarfs lunarfs requested a review from bhamail as a code owner March 31, 2025 06:16
@lunarfs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

lunarfs commented Apr 4, 2025

@bhamail sad to finde out you where not on Kubecon 2025 London, had a short chat with a few of your colleagues there. Anyways so I have been thinking where do we want to take this? I see a few options . I realy like the noarch installer, but if you think we need an arch specific with the embedded java also, then i propose that we extend the suit to contain both a noarch, an x86_64 and an aarch64 installer. what do you think (Potentially doing the two binary versions as a new PR)

@lunarfs
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

lunarfs commented May 20, 2025

superseded by #49

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

😍 cla signed The CLA is signed

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant