Modified JA translations after human review#7520
Conversation
Some more work is needed. Review notes will be shared.
|
🧪 Jest Test Results ✅ All Jest tests passed! This PR is ready to merge. Coverage: Statements: 49.12% | Branches: 40.56% | Functions: 53.32% | Lines: 49.54% |
|
Here are my notes, as I was working through the review: Most important for @walterbender to look at are questions labeled "English" or "Non-translation question". If I left something labeled "autotranslate" it's because I had a bigger question, and couldn't get to a good enough guess. There are some things I'd want to take a second look at for consistency, but what's in there is prob "good enough" for now. |
|
@pikurasa I will rerun the conversion to Kana for you to review based on these new translations. |
Some more work is needed. Review notes will be shared. Co-authored-by: Devin Ulibarri <devin@devinulibarri.com>
Some more work is needed. Review notes will be shared.