20251126 112405#156
Conversation
mpragosa-te
commented
Nov 26, 2025
- feature: wipes existing code in preparation for new version
- feat: Fixes the client content type matching regex
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #125)
- fix: fixes content-type regex matcher (fix: fixes content-type regex matcher #126)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #128)
- feature: Support new release workflow and set User-Agent header with SDK version (feature: Support new release workflow and set User-Agent header with SDK version #131)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #133)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #134)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #135)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #137)
- feat: Print the response log when the api call failed (feat: Print the response log when the api call failed #139)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #142)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #143)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #144)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #146)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #147)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #149)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK ([GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK #150)
- feat: Use retry http and add backoff (feat: Use retry http and add backoff #151)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK (20251017 115623 #153)
- [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK
feat: renames core module to client feature: moves some functions to an internal module feat: small comment changes feature - fixes default server url feature - updates go sdk version on user agent feature - includes core module prior to v7 upgrade
* feature - includes core module prior to v7 upgrade * feature - updates go sdk version on user agent * feature - fixes default server url * feat: small comment changes * feature: moves some functions to an internal module * feat: renames core module to client * [GitHub Bot] Generated go SDK --------- Co-authored-by: Phellippe Lima <phpinhei@thousandeyes.com> Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
* update the client log * receive the responseBody and stateCode from the agent to format error message
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
Co-authored-by: API Team <api-team@thousandeyes.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| git config user.email "api-team@thousandeyes.com" | ||
|
|
||
| git add . | ||
| git commit -m "[GitHub Bot] Released ${{ inputs.releaseVersion }} SDK" | ||
| git push origin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Release push fails from detached checkout
The release job commits and then runs git push origin (lines 35‑39), but the workflow only performs a default actions/checkout@v4 so the runner is left on a detached HEAD. git push without an explicit ref fails with “you are not currently on a branch”, preventing the release commit and tag from being published. Explicitly check out the target branch or push HEAD:<branch> before tagging to make this workflow succeed.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.