Skip to content

Refactor pyuartsi to decouple TSI backend and add FTDI SPI TSI support - #8

Open
doihead wants to merge 4 commits into
ucb-bar:mainfrom
doihead:spitsi-refactor
Open

Refactor pyuartsi to decouple TSI backend and add FTDI SPI TSI support#8
doihead wants to merge 4 commits into
ucb-bar:mainfrom
doihead:spitsi-refactor

Conversation

@doihead

@doihead doihead commented Apr 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

No description provided.

@T-K-233

T-K-233 commented May 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks for the PR.

The SPI logic looks good. However, I think it is better (and cleaner) to separate the entry point, so we have pyuartsi that drives the UART-based TSI interface, and perhaps pyspitsi that drives the SPI interface.

Thoughts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants