Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fix _get_vllm_state_dict for LFM2 models #531
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Fix _get_vllm_state_dict for LFM2 models #531
Changes from all commits
84bcb1aFile filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Jump to
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The logic inside this loop has become quite complex with the large
if is_lfm2: ... else: ...block. To improve readability and maintainability, consider refactoring the logic for LFM2 and non-LFM2 models into separate helper functions. This would make the main loop in_get_vllm_state_dictmuch cleaner and easier to follow.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Using
exec()is generally discouraged due to security risks and reduced code clarity, and this pattern appears multiple times in the function. It would be safer and more maintainable to replaceexec()with a helper function that usesgetattr()andsetattr()to navigate the model structure and assign the weights. For example, you could write a helper to parse thelayer_name_brstring, retrieve the target module, and then set itsweightandbiasattributes directly.