Skip to content

[DO NOT MERGE][docs] migrate to new geistdocs facelift#1666

Open
christopherkindl wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
ck/navbar-update
Open

[DO NOT MERGE][docs] migrate to new geistdocs facelift#1666
christopherkindl wants to merge 6 commits intomainfrom
ck/navbar-update

Conversation

@christopherkindl
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@christopherkindl christopherkindl commented Apr 9, 2026

Migrates to new geistdocs facelift:

  • new navbar
  • subtle theme token changes
  • subtle docs layout changes

Preview: https://workflow-docs-git-ck-navbar-update.vercel.sh/

image

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel bot commented Apr 9, 2026

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
example-nextjs-workflow-turbopack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
example-nextjs-workflow-webpack Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
example-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workbench-astro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workbench-express-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workbench-fastify-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workbench-hono-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workbench-nitro-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workbench-nuxt-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workbench-sveltekit-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workbench-vite-workflow Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workflow-docs Ready Ready Preview, Comment, Open in v0 Apr 10, 2026 9:16am
workflow-swc-playground Ready Ready Preview, Comment Apr 10, 2026 9:16am

@changeset-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown

changeset-bot bot commented Apr 9, 2026

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: f2c4af9

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2026

📊 Benchmark Results

📈 Comparing against baseline from main branch. Green 🟢 = faster, Red 🔺 = slower.

workflow with no steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.037s (~) 1.005s (~) 0.968s 10 1.00x
💻 Local Express 0.044s (+2.1%) 1.005s (~) 0.961s 10 1.18x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.046s (-27.6% 🟢) 1.009s (~) 0.964s 10 1.23x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.062s (-7.1% 🟢) 1.012s (~) 0.950s 10 1.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 0.215s (-24.0% 🟢) 2.039s (-17.9% 🟢) 1.824s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 0.272s (+12.4% 🔺) 2.236s (+5.3% 🔺) 1.964s 10 1.27x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

workflow with 1 step

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 1.095s (-0.6%) 2.006s (~) 0.911s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 1.109s (-3.7%) 2.010s (~) 0.901s 10 1.01x
💻 Local Express 1.124s (-0.6%) 2.006s (~) 0.882s 10 1.03x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.142s (~) 2.009s (~) 0.867s 10 1.04x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 1.883s (+0.7%) 3.627s (-5.6% 🟢) 1.743s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 1.905s (-9.1% 🟢) 4.029s (+5.0%) 2.124s 10 1.01x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro

workflow with 10 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 10.642s (~) 11.024s (~) 0.382s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 10.679s (-1.6%) 11.019s (~) 0.341s 3 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 10.867s (~) 11.020s (~) 0.153s 3 1.02x
💻 Local Express 10.936s (~) 11.023s (~) 0.086s 3 1.03x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 16.303s (-2.6%) 18.210s (-2.7%) 1.907s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 16.385s (-2.6%) 18.939s (~) 2.554s 2 1.01x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro

workflow with 25 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 13.952s (-3.8%) 14.020s (-6.7% 🟢) 0.068s 5 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 14.253s (~) 15.033s (~) 0.780s 4 1.02x
🐘 Postgres Express 14.479s (-0.6%) 15.021s (~) 0.542s 4 1.04x
💻 Local Express 14.982s (~) 15.030s (-6.2% 🟢) 0.048s 4 1.07x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 29.398s (-6.4% 🟢) 31.053s (-7.6% 🟢) 1.655s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 31.638s (+4.9%) 33.255s (+3.1%) 1.617s 2 1.08x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

workflow with 50 sequential steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 12.842s (-7.4% 🟢) 13.021s (-7.1% 🟢) 0.179s 7 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 13.777s (-2.2%) 14.023s (-4.9%) 0.246s 7 1.07x
💻 Local Nitro 14.886s (~) 15.029s (~) 0.143s 6 1.16x
💻 Local Express 16.678s (-1.5%) 17.030s (~) 0.352s 6 1.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 51.208s (-5.1% 🟢) 53.728s (-3.9%) 2.520s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 51.748s (-1.5%) 53.048s (-3.1%) 1.300s 2 1.01x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

Promise.all with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.194s (-5.8% 🟢) 2.008s (~) 0.815s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.268s (~) 2.009s (~) 0.741s 15 1.06x
💻 Local Nitro 1.452s (-2.9%) 2.006s (~) 0.554s 15 1.22x
💻 Local Express 1.549s (+1.3%) 2.006s (~) 0.457s 15 1.30x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.037s (-14.2% 🟢) 3.642s (-11.9% 🟢) 1.605s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.172s (-12.9% 🟢) 3.980s (+1.0%) 1.808s 8 1.07x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro

Promise.all with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.276s (-3.5%) 3.009s (~) 0.733s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.365s (+1.5%) 3.009s (~) 0.644s 10 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 2.550s (-6.5% 🟢) 3.008s (-6.2% 🟢) 0.458s 10 1.12x
💻 Local Express 2.911s (-8.6% 🟢) 3.341s (-16.7% 🟢) 0.431s 9 1.28x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.394s (-9.6% 🟢) 3.857s (-5.9% 🟢) 1.462s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.161s (+2.9%) 4.798s (+6.5% 🔺) 1.637s 7 1.32x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro

Promise.all with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.374s (-3.7%) 4.009s (~) 0.635s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.470s (-0.9%) 4.010s (~) 0.540s 8 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 6.774s (-12.5% 🟢) 7.217s (-15.3% 🟢) 0.443s 5 2.01x
💻 Local Express 8.189s (-1.9%) 9.024s (~) 0.835s 4 2.43x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.797s (-6.9% 🟢) 4.632s (-0.8%) 1.835s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 3.161s (+7.2% 🔺) 4.523s (-4.1%) 1.362s 7 1.13x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

Promise.race with 10 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.189s (-5.5% 🟢) 2.008s (~) 0.818s 15 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.258s (-2.9%) 2.008s (~) 0.750s 15 1.06x
💻 Local Express 1.507s (-3.7%) 2.006s (~) 0.500s 15 1.27x
💻 Local Nitro 1.534s (+1.9%) 2.006s (~) 0.472s 15 1.29x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.546s (+32.2% 🔺) 4.240s (+14.2% 🔺) 1.694s 8 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.984s (+52.7% 🔺) 4.789s (+25.7% 🔺) 1.805s 7 1.17x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro

Promise.race with 25 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.275s (-2.5%) 3.009s (~) 0.733s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 2.351s (-1.2%) 3.009s (~) 0.658s 10 1.03x
💻 Local Nitro 2.713s (-22.4% 🟢) 3.009s (-25.0% 🟢) 0.295s 10 1.19x
💻 Local Express 2.940s (-7.3% 🟢) 3.565s (-8.2% 🟢) 0.625s 9 1.29x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 2.211s (-15.6% 🟢) 3.679s (-16.6% 🟢) 1.468s 9 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 2.610s (~) 4.372s (+2.4%) 1.762s 7 1.18x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro

Promise.race with 50 concurrent steps

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 3.369s (-2.8%) 4.010s (~) 0.641s 8 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.501s (~) 4.011s (~) 0.510s 8 1.04x
💻 Local Nitro 7.772s (-8.6% 🟢) 8.268s (-8.4% 🟢) 0.496s 4 2.31x
💻 Local Express 8.612s (-15.7% 🟢) 9.024s (-18.1% 🟢) 0.412s 4 2.56x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.965s (+14.5% 🔺) 4.611s (+7.4% 🔺) 1.647s 7 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 4.302s (+46.7% 🔺) 6.038s (+43.3% 🔺) 1.736s 5 1.45x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

workflow with 10 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.592s (-29.2% 🟢) 1.006s (-1.6%) 0.414s 60 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.698s (-5.2% 🟢) 1.004s (~) 0.306s 60 1.18x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.798s (-7.6% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.208s 60 1.35x
💻 Local Express 0.983s (-3.1%) 1.115s (-34.4% 🟢) 0.133s 54 1.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 8.699s (+1.6%) 10.496s (+2.8%) 1.797s 6 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 9.018s (-1.9%) 10.748s (-2.1%) 1.731s 6 1.04x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

workflow with 25 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.414s (-27.2% 🟢) 2.007s (-4.4%) 0.593s 45 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.880s (-12.8% 🟢) 2.029s (-31.9% 🟢) 0.149s 45 1.33x
💻 Local Nitro 2.272s (-11.5% 🟢) 3.008s (-5.4% 🟢) 0.736s 30 1.61x
💻 Local Express 3.225s (+4.4%) 3.730s (-7.0% 🟢) 0.505s 25 2.28x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 27.210s (-7.5% 🟢) 29.817s (-5.4% 🟢) 2.607s 4 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 28.936s (+3.4%) 30.486s (+1.8%) 1.550s 4 1.06x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

workflow with 50 sequential data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 2.918s (-26.9% 🟢) 3.193s (-25.7% 🟢) 0.275s 38 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 3.794s (-12.0% 🟢) 4.042s (-19.4% 🟢) 0.248s 30 1.30x
💻 Local Nitro 7.395s (-4.1%) 8.015s (-2.5%) 0.619s 15 2.53x
💻 Local Express 9.131s (-0.8%) 9.787s (-2.3%) 0.656s 13 3.13x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 68.338s (-4.6%) 70.855s (-4.8%) 2.517s 2 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 73.377s (-6.4% 🟢) 74.969s (-6.5% 🟢) 1.592s 2 1.07x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

workflow with 10 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.222s (-21.4% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.785s 60 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.280s (-5.3% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.726s 60 1.26x
💻 Local Nitro 0.590s (-11.1% 🟢) 1.004s (~) 0.415s 60 2.66x
💻 Local Express 0.590s (-1.1%) 1.004s (-1.7%) 0.414s 60 2.66x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 1.460s (-46.5% 🟢) 3.201s (-28.1% 🟢) 1.741s 19 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.479s (-2.8%) 2.952s (-4.7%) 1.473s 21 1.01x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

workflow with 25 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.357s (-26.8% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.648s 90 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.501s (-4.7%) 1.007s (~) 0.506s 90 1.40x
💻 Local Nitro 2.395s (-12.8% 🟢) 3.008s (-5.5% 🟢) 0.613s 30 6.70x
💻 Local Express 2.543s (+1.3%) 3.009s (~) 0.466s 30 7.12x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.579s (+4.3%) 4.344s (+4.9%) 1.766s 21 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.701s (-1.3%) 4.311s (-0.9%) 1.609s 21 1.05x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

workflow with 50 concurrent data payload steps (10KB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.563s (-28.4% 🟢) 1.006s (~) 0.444s 120 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.802s (-4.6%) 1.008s (-1.0%) 0.207s 119 1.42x
💻 Local Nitro 10.204s (-8.4% 🟢) 10.774s (-9.1% 🟢) 0.570s 12 18.13x
💻 Local Express 11.133s (+1.2%) 11.753s (+0.8%) 0.620s 11 19.78x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 6.866s (~) 8.556s (-1.6%) 1.690s 15 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 6.889s (-10.3% 🟢) 8.893s (-4.9%) 2.004s 14 1.00x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro

Stream Benchmarks (includes TTFB metrics)
workflow with stream

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
💻 Local 🥇 Nitro 0.142s (-3.9%) 1.004s (~) 0.010s (+7.7% 🔺) 1.016s (~) 0.874s 10 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Nitro 0.145s (-27.3% 🟢) 1.000s (~) 0.001s (-18.8% 🟢) 1.009s (~) 0.864s 10 1.02x
💻 Local Express 0.202s (-3.4%) 1.004s (~) 0.011s (-7.3% 🟢) 1.018s (~) 0.816s 10 1.43x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.208s (-3.2%) 0.991s (~) 0.001s (-17.6% 🟢) 1.010s (~) 0.802s 10 1.47x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 1.410s (-9.3% 🟢) 2.639s (-11.8% 🟢) 0.698s (+19.2% 🔺) 3.828s (-4.5%) 2.418s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 1.443s (-2.4%) 2.396s (-20.8% 🟢) 0.768s (+153.2% 🔺) 3.540s (-6.0% 🟢) 2.097s 10 1.02x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

stream pipeline with 5 transform steps (1MB)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.505s (-16.6% 🟢) 1.007s (~) 0.005s (+14.0% 🔺) 1.021s (~) 0.516s 59 1.00x
💻 Local Nitro 0.574s (-13.3% 🟢) 1.011s (~) 0.009s (-16.3% 🟢) 1.022s (~) 0.449s 59 1.14x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.616s (-4.7%) 1.005s (~) 0.004s (-22.3% 🟢) 1.023s (~) 0.407s 59 1.22x
💻 Local Express 0.736s (~) 1.013s (~) 0.009s (-3.4%) 1.023s (~) 0.287s 59 1.46x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 3.720s (-15.1% 🟢) 5.207s (-13.1% 🟢) 0.346s (+17.2% 🔺) 6.021s (-11.7% 🟢) 2.301s 10 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 4.322s (+2.3%) 5.626s (-3.9%) 0.247s (+12.6% 🔺) 6.273s (-3.3%) 1.951s 10 1.16x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

10 parallel streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 0.901s (-4.6%) 1.054s (-8.1% 🟢) 0.000s (-38.1% 🟢) 1.071s (-7.8% 🟢) 0.170s 56 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 0.974s (-1.8%) 1.233s (-7.6% 🟢) 0.000s (-56.0% 🟢) 1.248s (-8.9% 🟢) 0.273s 50 1.08x
💻 Local Nitro 1.162s (-12.3% 🟢) 2.019s (~) 0.001s (+5.9% 🔺) 2.022s (~) 0.860s 30 1.29x
💻 Local Express 1.244s (-2.3%) 2.021s (~) 0.000s (+9.1% 🔺) 2.023s (~) 0.779s 30 1.38x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Nitro 2.505s (-1.6%) 3.938s (+9.9% 🔺) 0.000s (-100.0% 🟢) 4.408s (+7.4% 🔺) 1.903s 14 1.00x
▲ Vercel Express 2.768s (+4.7%) 3.902s (+5.1% 🔺) 0.000s (-46.4% 🟢) 4.293s (+3.6%) 1.525s 14 1.10x

🔍 Observability: Nitro | Express

fan-out fan-in 10 streams (1MB each)

💻 Local Development

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
🐘 Postgres 🥇 Nitro 1.647s (-7.6% 🟢) 2.104s (~) 0.000s (~) 2.111s (~) 0.464s 29 1.00x
🐘 Postgres Express 1.780s (~) 2.142s (~) 0.000s (+Infinity% 🔺) 2.154s (~) 0.374s 28 1.08x
💻 Local Nitro 3.386s (-14.2% 🟢) 4.034s (-11.0% 🟢) 0.001s (+18.8% 🔺) 4.037s (-11.0% 🟢) 0.651s 15 2.06x
💻 Local Express 3.509s (-4.2%) 4.099s (-1.7%) 0.001s (-18.2% 🟢) 4.101s (-1.7%) 0.592s 15 2.13x

▲ Production (Vercel)

World Framework Workflow Time TTFB Slurp Wall Time Overhead Samples vs Fastest
▲ Vercel 🥇 Express 3.353s (-1.2%) 4.441s (-8.5% 🟢) 0.000s (-69.2% 🟢) 4.801s (-9.6% 🟢) 1.448s 13 1.00x
▲ Vercel Nitro 3.632s (+2.1%) 5.368s (+9.7% 🔺) 0.000s (-63.6% 🟢) 5.879s (+10.4% 🔺) 2.247s 11 1.08x

🔍 Observability: Express | Nitro

Summary

Fastest Framework by World

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

World 🥇 Fastest Framework Wins
💻 Local Nitro 20/21
🐘 Postgres Nitro 21/21
▲ Vercel Nitro 13/21
Fastest World by Framework

Winner determined by most benchmark wins

Framework 🥇 Fastest World Wins
Express 🐘 Postgres 16/21
Nitro 🐘 Postgres 15/21
Column Definitions
  • Workflow Time: Runtime reported by workflow (completedAt - createdAt) - primary metric
  • TTFB: Time to First Byte - time from workflow start until first stream byte received (stream benchmarks only)
  • Slurp: Time from first byte to complete stream consumption (stream benchmarks only)
  • Wall Time: Total testbench time (trigger workflow + poll for result)
  • Overhead: Testbench overhead (Wall Time - Workflow Time)
  • Samples: Number of benchmark iterations run
  • vs Fastest: How much slower compared to the fastest configuration for this benchmark

Worlds:

  • 💻 Local: In-memory filesystem world (local development)
  • 🐘 Postgres: PostgreSQL database world (local development)
  • ▲ Vercel: Vercel production/preview deployment
  • 🌐 Turso: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 MongoDB: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Redis: Community world (local development)
  • 🌐 Jazz: Community world (local development)

📋 View full workflow run


Some benchmark jobs failed:

  • Local: success
  • Postgres: success
  • Vercel: failure

Check the workflow run for details.

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 9, 2026

🧪 E2E Test Results

Some tests failed

Summary

Passed Failed Skipped Total
✅ ▲ Vercel Production 923 0 67 990
✅ 💻 Local Development 898 0 182 1080
✅ 📦 Local Production 835 0 155 990
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres 898 0 182 1080
✅ 🪟 Windows 82 0 8 90
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds 133 74 24 231
✅ 📋 Other 228 0 42 270
Total 3997 74 660 4731

❌ Failed Tests

🌍 Community Worlds (74 failed)

mongodb (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNVAV76FQ9BP869CC6DVQSXT
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAVGDM8NHSFKEQ1DVX3YJ0
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAYY1WDNJFHBXQTP3HP520
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNVB39VNCPN2YQFW1V7YKEKB
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNVBAENDRG3F5VX3D47D510Z

redis (7 failed):

  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNVAV76FQ9BP869CC6DVQSXT
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAVGDM8NHSFKEQ1DVX3YJ0
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAYY1WDNJFHBXQTP3HP520
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNVB39VNCPN2YQFW1V7YKEKB
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNVBAENDRG3F5VX3D47D510Z

turso (60 failed):

  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAT025S5707B22TC62NKCB
  • addTenWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAT025S5707B22TC62NKCB
  • wellKnownAgentWorkflow (.well-known/agent) | wrun_01KNVAW555F08XWDKGS2TFH0FV
  • should work with react rendering in step
  • promiseAllWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAT76QN806JF4306N55VDV
  • promiseRaceWorkflow | wrun_01KNVATC0RFGR93PWR1YAHBHNP
  • promiseAnyWorkflow | wrun_01KNVATEBBM99P58ANK1J0G00F
  • importedStepOnlyWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAWHGHPT6JVR5NECJ1SW5X
  • hookWorkflow | wrun_01KNVATTK9P5EVRAC4ZHEGX583
  • hookWorkflow is not resumable via public webhook endpoint | wrun_01KNVAV76FQ9BP869CC6DVQSXT
  • webhookWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAVGDM8NHSFKEQ1DVX3YJ0
  • sleepingWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAVQAH0SBWQRGMX7Y1YP2J
  • parallelSleepWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAW3FNKTAHN9XWYWE22NRB
  • nullByteWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAW6YC5XCB13QQS6582KKT
  • workflowAndStepMetadataWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAW9D5NV3N6GDPCQHJEJ4E
  • fetchWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAYY1WDNJFHBXQTP3HP520
  • promiseRaceStressTestWorkflow | wrun_01KNVAZ1NWQCEWFCCNQHKKZ2FF
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors nested function calls preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation workflow errors cross-file imports preserve message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors basic step error preserves message and stack trace
  • error handling error propagation step errors cross-file step error preserves message and function names in stack
  • error handling retry behavior regular Error retries until success
  • error handling retry behavior FatalError fails immediately without retries
  • error handling retry behavior RetryableError respects custom retryAfter delay
  • error handling retry behavior maxRetries=0 disables retries
  • error handling catchability FatalError can be caught and detected with FatalError.is()
  • error handling not registered WorkflowNotRegisteredError fails the run when workflow does not exist
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the step but workflow can catch it
  • error handling not registered StepNotRegisteredError fails the run when not caught in workflow
  • hookCleanupTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after workflow completion | wrun_01KNVB2NV8FYD3FX1PBGE0QWC4
  • concurrent hook token conflict - two workflows cannot use the same hook token simultaneously | wrun_01KNVB39VNCPN2YQFW1V7YKEKB
  • hookDisposeTestWorkflow - hook token reuse after explicit disposal while workflow still running | wrun_01KNVB40A0H9167Q7H3PK1G7DD
  • stepFunctionPassingWorkflow - step function references can be passed as arguments (without closure vars) | wrun_01KNVB4P2C0A5VBYVQNJD6SPVD
  • stepFunctionWithClosureWorkflow - step function with closure variables passed as argument | wrun_01KNVB4ZH44Z9DGN01TCQVTHKY
  • closureVariableWorkflow - nested step functions with closure variables | wrun_01KNVB55M1YXNFEW40B990EQSQ
  • spawnWorkflowFromStepWorkflow - spawning a child workflow using start() inside a step | wrun_01KNVB57X9M0G638VCPSM13P0P
  • runClassSerializationWorkflow - Run instances serialize across workflow/step boundaries | wrun_01KNVB5KZHW9RZ9FQQG8YQ4XWC
  • health check (queue-based) - workflow and step endpoints respond to health check messages
  • health check (CLI) - workflow health command reports healthy endpoints
  • pathsAliasWorkflow - TypeScript path aliases resolve correctly | wrun_01KNVB64N7Z6MRQ1G7VWA3KX4F
  • Calculator.calculate - static workflow method using static step methods from another class | wrun_01KNVB6AR6AABS7H91JD44HWKX
  • AllInOneService.processNumber - static workflow method using sibling static step methods | wrun_01KNVB6HSF6NW36WMM5QF1NTFW
  • ChainableService.processWithThis - static step methods using this to reference the class | wrun_01KNVB6RY1RJP37549KCF7NY8W
  • thisSerializationWorkflow - step function invoked with .call() and .apply() | wrun_01KNVB706BTPMQ10CPCS5H7EHF
  • customSerializationWorkflow - custom class serialization with WORKFLOW_SERIALIZE/WORKFLOW_DESERIALIZE | wrun_01KNVB77BYE7XHGS9QF6J2FFW7
  • instanceMethodStepWorkflow - instance methods with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNVB7EZQJ523FMP6JAGTPH0T
  • crossContextSerdeWorkflow - classes defined in step code are deserializable in workflow context | wrun_01KNVB7TW2MDPAWB56Z4BF1ZZ1
  • stepFunctionAsStartArgWorkflow - step function reference passed as start() argument | wrun_01KNVB835SGMG539KW35NWX0BM
  • cancelRun - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNVB8CQ36VPZCAEKQBDVCFXX
  • cancelRun via CLI - cancelling a running workflow | wrun_01KNVB8PA939ZNSNNZ15BNT74Y
  • pages router addTenWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router promiseAllWorkflow via pages router
  • pages router sleepingWorkflow via pages router
  • hookWithSleepWorkflow - hook payloads delivered correctly with concurrent sleep | wrun_01KNVB92RBQMTT541T9RSF2D3T
  • sleepInLoopWorkflow - sleep inside loop with steps actually delays each iteration | wrun_01KNVB9R9X4QV45KKG0P19R0E7
  • sleepWithSequentialStepsWorkflow - sequential steps work with concurrent sleep (control) | wrun_01KNVBA32QY66E5EFD1NKGV6H4
  • importMetaUrlWorkflow - import.meta.url is available in step bundles | wrun_01KNVBAA2NR58XHJ3BQNC7Q4JF
  • metadataFromHelperWorkflow - getWorkflowMetadata/getStepMetadata work from module-level helper (#1577) | wrun_01KNVBACD0FV6J8DW24M0A5MCE
  • resilient start: addTenWorkflow completes when run_created returns 500 | wrun_01KNVBAENDRG3F5VX3D47D510Z
  • getterStepWorkflow - getter functions with "use step" directive | wrun_01KNVBAKMKJF5HE0VM6AK2G2YR

Details by Category

✅ ▲ Vercel Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro 83 0 7
✅ example 83 0 7
✅ express 83 0 7
✅ fastify 83 0 7
✅ hono 83 0 7
✅ nextjs-turbopack 88 0 2
✅ nextjs-webpack 88 0 2
✅ nitro 83 0 7
✅ nuxt 83 0 7
✅ sveltekit 83 0 7
✅ vite 83 0 7
✅ 💻 Local Development
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 📦 Local Production
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🐘 Local Postgres
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ astro-stable 76 0 14
✅ express-stable 76 0 14
✅ fastify-stable 76 0 14
✅ hono-stable 76 0 14
✅ nextjs-turbopack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-turbopack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nextjs-webpack-canary 63 0 27
✅ nextjs-webpack-stable 82 0 8
✅ nitro-stable 76 0 14
✅ nuxt-stable 76 0 14
✅ sveltekit-stable 76 0 14
✅ vite-stable 76 0 14
✅ 🪟 Windows
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ nextjs-turbopack 82 0 8
❌ 🌍 Community Worlds
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ mongodb-dev 6 0 0
❌ mongodb 56 7 8
✅ redis-dev 6 0 0
❌ redis 56 7 8
✅ turso-dev 6 0 0
❌ turso 3 60 8
✅ 📋 Other
App Passed Failed Skipped
✅ e2e-local-dev-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-postgres-nest-stable 76 0 14
✅ e2e-local-prod-nest-stable 76 0 14

📋 View full workflow run


Some E2E test jobs failed:

  • Vercel Prod: success
  • Local Dev: success
  • Local Prod: failure
  • Local Postgres: success
  • Windows: success

Check the workflow run for details.

…l@users.noreply.github.com>

I, christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkindl@users.noreply.github.com>, hereby add my Signed-off-by to this commit: ba7353f
I, christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkindl@users.noreply.github.com>, hereby add my Signed-off-by to this commit: e83ca81
I, christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkindl@users.noreply.github.com>, hereby add my Signed-off-by to this commit: 8e69ff0

Signed-off-by: christopherkindl <53372002+christopherkindl@users.noreply.github.com>
…ency array [], making it a no-op that never fires on actual route changes.

This commit fixes the issue reported at docs/components/geistdocs/mobile-menu.tsx:80

## Bug Analysis

The `MobileMenu` component at `docs/components/geistdocs/mobile-menu.tsx` line 80 has a useEffect intended to close the menu on route changes:

```js
useEffect(() => {
  setShow(false);
}, []);
```

The empty dependency array `[]` means this effect runs exactly once — on initial mount — when `show` is already `false` (its initial state). This is a complete no-op. It never detects or responds to route changes.

**When this manifests:** If a user opens the mobile menu and then navigates via browser back/forward buttons, the menu remains open and `document.body.style.overflow` stays set to `'hidden'`, completely locking page scroll. While clicking the `NavLink` items within the menu closes it via their `onClick={close}` handlers, programmatic/browser-level navigation bypasses those handlers.

**Impact:** Users on mobile who use browser navigation while the menu is open will have a broken experience — the menu stays open overlaying the page and body scroll is locked.

## Fix

Replaced the empty-dependency useEffect with the correct pattern already demonstrated in the sibling `sidebar.tsx` component:

1.  Added `usePathname()` from `next/navigation` to track the current route.
2.  Added a `useRef` to store the previous pathname.
3.  Updated the useEffect to depend on `pathname`, comparing it to the previous value and closing the menu when a change is detected.

This ensures the menu closes on any route change, whether triggered by clicking a link, browser back/forward, or programmatic navigation.


Co-authored-by: Vercel <vercel[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: christopherkindl <christopher.kindl@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant