task2: wallet 2 wallet interactions and EWB considerations#106
Open
peppelinux wants to merge 3 commits into
Open
task2: wallet 2 wallet interactions and EWB considerations#106peppelinux wants to merge 3 commits into
peppelinux wants to merge 3 commits into
Conversation
Removed user path from document detail in the source evaluated section.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR provides a technical–legal evidence report on how verifiers and wallet-relying parties establish trust with wallet instances, with dedicated coverage of wallet-to-wallet (W2W) flows and the proposed European Business Wallets (EBW) regulation.
The document consolidates normative sources from the EUDI ARF and eIDAS legal-tech references (CIRs 2977, 2979, 2982, 2025/848; eIDAS Art. 5a/5b) and maps them to ARF High-Level Requirements (RPA_, OIA_, WUA_, W2W_). It highlights the WIA presentation boundary (WUA_24, STS9_30) and notes where CIR 2982 and current TS9/ARF approaches still need harmonisation (Topic J RR).
Section 9 evaluates COM(2025) 838 (EBW proposal) for trust implications: EBW-relying party authentication, wallet unit attestations, EBW↔EUDI interoperability, and relevance to WP4 Track 2 trust profiles.
Tasks for reviewers: