test: ci cache probe (identical to #132) - #133
Conversation
Review Summary by Qodo(Agentic_describe updated until commit 1070279)Flip counter test assertion for CI cache validation
WalkthroughsDescription• Modified counter test assertion to fail intentionally • Changed expected counter value from 1n to 999n • Probing CI cache behavior on fresh branch Diagramflowchart LR
A["Counter Test"] -- "Change assertion" --> B["Expected: 1n → 999n"]
B -- "Trigger CI" --> C["Probe cache behavior"]
File Changes1. src/ts/counter.test.ts
|
|
Code review by qodo was updated up to the latest commit 1070279 |
![qodo-code-review[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/484649?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| }) | ||
| ).result, | ||
| ).toBe(1n); | ||
| ).toBe(999n); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1. Wrong increment expectation 🐞 Bug ≡ Correctness
src/ts/counter.test.ts now asserts the counter becomes 999n after a single increment(), but the contract increments by exactly 1 from the default 0. This will fail CI and misrepresents the Counter contract behavior.
Agent Prompt
## Issue description
The TypeScript e2e test expects `999n` after a single `increment()`, but the Counter contract increments the stored counter by `+1`, so the correct expected value is `1n`.
## Issue Context
- Contract logic increments `current_value + 1`.
- Noir tests already assert the post-increment value is `1`.
## Fix Focus Areas
- src/ts/counter.test.ts[55-55]
ⓘ Copy this prompt and use it to remediate the issue with your preferred AI generation tools
![cubic-dev-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1082092?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 1 file
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="src/ts/counter.test.ts">
<violation number="1" location="src/ts/counter.test.ts:55">
P1: The test expectation was changed to an incorrect counter value (`999n`), which breaks the correctness of this integration test.</violation>
</file>
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic
| }) | ||
| ).result, | ||
| ).toBe(1n); | ||
| ).toBe(999n); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
P1: The test expectation was changed to an incorrect counter value (999n), which breaks the correctness of this integration test.
Prompt for AI agents
Check if this issue is valid — if so, understand the root cause and fix it. At src/ts/counter.test.ts, line 55:
<comment>The test expectation was changed to an incorrect counter value (`999n`), which breaks the correctness of this integration test.</comment>
<file context>
@@ -52,6 +52,6 @@ describe("Counter Contract", () => {
})
).result,
- ).toBe(1n);
+ ).toBe(999n);
});
});
</file context>
| ).toBe(999n); | |
| ).toBe(1n); |
Code Review by Qodo
1. Wrong increment expectation
|
CI Feedback 🧐A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:
|
1 participant
Identical tree to #132 on a fresh branch — probing whether Actions/AdvSec suppression is keyed on the head sha or on the branch.