Conversation
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)Reviewer's GuideUpdates project documentation to reference the final published Chemical Reviews article instead of the prior arXiv preprint, including badges and primary reading links. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - I've found 1 issue
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location path="README.md" line_range="10-11" />
<code_context>
## 📘 Read the Review
You can read the review directly on
or access it as a collaborative online book at:
-👉 [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.07456)
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
**suggestion (typo):** The sentence is incomplete and could be clarified by specifying where the review can be read.
The phrase "You can read the review directly on" is missing its object, so the sentence is grammatically incomplete. Consider something like: "You can read the review directly on Chemical Reviews, or access it as a collaborative online book at:"
```suggestion
You can read the review directly on Chemical Reviews, or access it as a collaborative online book at:
```
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
| You can read the review directly on | ||
| or access it as a collaborative online book at: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
suggestion (typo): The sentence is incomplete and could be clarified by specifying where the review can be read.
The phrase "You can read the review directly on" is missing its object, so the sentence is grammatically incomplete. Consider something like: "You can read the review directly on Chemical Reviews, or access it as a collaborative online book at:"
| You can read the review directly on | |
| or access it as a collaborative online book at: | |
| You can read the review directly on Chemical Reviews, or access it as a collaborative online book at: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
Updates the project’s recommended citation and top-level references from the arXiv preprint to the final published Chemical Reviews version.
Changes:
- Replaced the BibTeX citation in the Quarto book index with the Chemical Reviews publication metadata.
- Updated README badges and “Read the Review” link to point to the published DOI/article page.
Reviewed changes
Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| quarto_book/index.qmd | Swaps the arXiv BibTeX entry for the published Chemical Reviews citation details. |
| README.md | Replaces arXiv badge/link with DOI badge and published article link. |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
| author = {Alampara, Nawaf and Aneesh, Anagha and Ríos-García, Martiño and Mirza, Adrian and Schilling-Wilhelmi, Mara and Aghajani, Ali Asghar and Sun, Meiling and Prastalo, Gordan and Jablonka, Kevin Maik}, | ||
| year = {2026}, | ||
| month = feb, | ||
| pages = {2484–2549} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In BibTeX, page ranges should use a double hyphen (--) rather than a Unicode en-dash. Using 2484–2549 can break some BibTeX parsers/formatters or render incorrectly; consider switching to 2484--2549.
| pages = {2484–2549} | |
| pages = {2484--2549} |
| url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583}, | ||
| DOI = {10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The BibTeX entry uses url = {http://dx.doi.org/...} and an uppercase DOI field. For better compatibility and avoiding mixed-content HTTP, prefer https://doi.org/... and the conventional lowercase doi field name (many tooling chains key off doi).
| url = {http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583}, | |
| DOI = {10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583}, | |
| url = {https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583}, | |
| doi = {10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583}, |
| or access it as a collaborative online book at: | ||
|
|
||
| 👉 [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.07456) | ||
| 👉 [Chemical Reviews](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For link stability, consider using the DOI resolver URL (https://doi.org/...) here instead of the publisher-specific pubs.acs.org/doi/full/... URL. The DOI link will remain stable even if the publisher changes URL structure.
| 👉 [Chemical Reviews](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583) | |
| 👉 [Chemical Reviews](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583) |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThis pull request updates citations from arXiv preprints to finalized journal publications, replacing an arXiv badge with a DOI reference in README.md and converting a BibTeX citation from a 2025 arXiv entry to a complete 2026 Chemical Reviews journal publication record. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Poem
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 10-13: The README contains an incomplete sentence fragment
starting with "or access it as a collaborative online book at:" (followed by "👉
[Chemical Reviews](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583)");
fix by rephrasing the two fragments into a single complete sentence or two clear
sentences—for example, prepend the missing subject to form "You can read the
review directly on [source] or access it as a collaborative online book at: 👉
[Chemical Reviews](...)" or remove "or" and make "Access it as a collaborative
online book at: 👉 [Chemical Reviews](...)" so the README reads cleanly and
grammatically.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: b36c82c3-772e-4684-b097-c81419c5175c
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
README.mdquarto_book/index.qmd
| You can read the review directly on | ||
| or access it as a collaborative online book at: | ||
|
|
||
| 👉 [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.07456) | ||
| 👉 [Chemical Reviews](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incomplete sentence on line 11.
Line 11 reads "or access it as a collaborative online book at:" which suggests there should be text before it (e.g., "You can read the review directly on [Chemical Reviews]... or access it..."). The sentence structure appears broken, likely from when the arXiv reference was removed.
Consider rephrasing for clarity:
📝 Suggested fix
## 📘 Read the Review
-You can read the review directly on
-or access it as a collaborative online book at:
+You can read the review directly on Chemical Reviews or access it as a collaborative online book:
👉 [Chemical Reviews](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583)📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| You can read the review directly on | |
| or access it as a collaborative online book at: | |
| 👉 [arXiv](https://arxiv.org/pdf/2507.07456) | |
| 👉 [Chemical Reviews](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583) | |
| ## 📘 Read the Review | |
| You can read the review directly on Chemical Reviews or access it as a collaborative online book: | |
| 👉 [Chemical Reviews](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583) |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
In `@README.md` around lines 10 - 13, The README contains an incomplete sentence
fragment starting with "or access it as a collaborative online book at:"
(followed by "👉 [Chemical
Reviews](https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5c00583)"); fix by
rephrasing the two fragments into a single complete sentence or two clear
sentences—for example, prepend the missing subject to form "You can read the
review directly on [source] or access it as a collaborative online book at: 👉
[Chemical Reviews](...)" or remove "or" and make "Access it as a collaborative
online book at: 👉 [Chemical Reviews](...)" so the README reads cleanly and
grammatically.
Summary by Sourcery
Documentation:
Summary by CodeRabbit