Is diffsim supported in the MuJoCo backend? #1483
Replies: 4 comments
|
Speaking for MuJoCo Warp the documentation is still accurate differentiability is neither supported nor actively being worked on. We are hoping to get there at some point, it's quite a bit of work though. |
|
@Siqi-MarvelLi please provide some information on how MJWarp differentially can help your use-case. Feel free to open a feature request in MJWarp and/or Newton repo. |
|
I would like to ask if there is any progress on this? Our team is targeting several server assembly tasks:
We encounter multiple challenges regarding this approach, mainly:
I am happy to answer questions and provide more details. |
|
Thanks for bumping this, it's probably a good idea to look at this: google-deepmind/mujoco_warp#1226 which is a community-contributed PR to mujoco warp, with a bit of discussion. The author does have a standalone fork that has a partial implementation, maybe that helps your case. could you try that out and give some feedback if you encounter any problems? |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I would like to ask whether the differentiable simulation (diffsim) feature is currently ready for the MuJoCo backend. I noticed in the documentation that MJWarp is not currently differentiable, and I’m wondering what the current status is.
Additionally, could you clarify which backend(s) currently support differentiable simulation?
All reactions