You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found some related discussions on differentiability in the MuJoCo-backend/MJWarp solver (#1483, google-deepmind/mujoco_warp#1226) and Newton's collision pipeline (#2164), but those seem focused on the rigid-body/contact solver rather than material point method (MPM).
Is the MPM solver in Newton currently differentiable (e.g. via Warp's autodiff/Tape), or is that not yet supported? I'm interested in gradient-based optimisation of material parameters or initial conditions through an MPM simulation.
Any info on the current status or known limitations would be great. Thank you!
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I found some related discussions on differentiability in the MuJoCo-backend/MJWarp solver (#1483, google-deepmind/mujoco_warp#1226) and Newton's collision pipeline (#2164), but those seem focused on the rigid-body/contact solver rather than material point method (MPM).
Is the MPM solver in Newton currently differentiable (e.g. via Warp's autodiff/Tape), or is that not yet supported? I'm interested in gradient-based optimisation of material parameters or initial conditions through an MPM simulation.
Any info on the current status or known limitations would be great. Thank you!
All reactions